Exploring Co-presence Enabled Collaboration in Social Computing Inspired Enterprise Systems

This research describes the findings from an interpretive case study that explores the interplay between social computing (SC) and enterprise systems (ES). A fundamental shift is evident in how organisations become more effective through the adoption of SC capabilities. As process centric ES continues to pose challenges, an SC inspired, people-centric ES has become a medium for efficient interaction and collaboration across the divisions of an organisation. In this organisational reality, we explore the role of virtual co-presence of users on collaboration in ES. Our findings indicate that virtual co-presence enabled interactions, when focused and sustained over time, could facilitate collaboration for sharing of knowledge. An understanding of how users interact in mediated encounters contributes to our knowledge of how focused interactions may enable collaborations in ES. By drawing on the findings, the research seeks to outline some implications for the practice of a collaborative ES for the contemporary organisations.

[1]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[3]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[4]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Continuance in expertise-sharing networks: a social perspective , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  Alexandre Beaudet,et al.  Fractal Design: Self-organizing Links in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[6]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[7]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[8]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Discovering Social Networks from Event Logs , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[9]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[10]  T. Curran,et al.  SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model , 1997 .

[11]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[12]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[14]  I. Her Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, in: The interpretation of cultures: selected essays . New-York/N.Y./USA etc , 2022 .

[15]  F. Stokman Evolution of social networks , 1997 .

[16]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  J. Meyrowitz,et al.  No sense of place : the impact of electronic media on social behavior , 1988 .

[19]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Broken Ties: The Impact of Organizational Restructuring on the Stability of Information-Processing Networks , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Durability of online teamworking: patterns of trust , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[21]  Doug Schuler,et al.  Social computing , 1994, CACM.

[22]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Social Computing: An Overview , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[25]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: what models are emerging? The results from a 70 case-based research , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[26]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[27]  R. Rettie Mobile Phone Communication: Extending Goffman to Mediated Interaction , 2009 .

[28]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[29]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Organizational Reference Groups: A Missing Perspective on Social Context , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[32]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Enterprise Modelling , 1998, ECOOP Workshops.

[33]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[34]  Kathy J. Lee What goes around comes around: an analysis of del.icio.us as social space , 2006, CSCW '06.

[35]  Deirdre Boden,et al.  The Compulsion of Proximity , 1993 .

[36]  E. Goffman Behavior in public places : notes on the social organization of gatherings , 1964 .

[37]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Virtually Embedded Ties , 2004 .

[38]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[39]  C. Geertz Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture , 1973 .

[40]  John Urry,et al.  Small Worlds and the New ‘Social Physics’ , 2004 .