"And This, Kids, Is How I Met Your Mother": Consumerist, Mundane, and Uncanny Futures with Sex Robots

Sex Robots are no longer science fiction and may soon be-come widespread. While much discussion has developed in academia on their moral and social impact, sex robots have yet to be examined from a critical design perspective and are under-explored in HCI. We use the Story Completion Method(SCM) to explore commonplace assumptions around futures with sex robots and discuss those from a critical design perspective. Thirty five participants completed a story stem of a human encountering a sex robot or vice-versa. Through thematic analysis, we show narratives of consumerist relation-ships between humans and sex robots, stories that describe sex robots as highly-efficient sex workers that (out)perform humans in routinal sex activities, and narratives that explore sex robots as empathetic and sentient beings. Our participant-created stories both reinforce and challenge established norms of sex robots and raise questions that concern responsible design and ethics in HCI. Finally, we show opportunities and limitations of using multiple-perspective story stems in SCM

[1]  K. Beverley,et al.  Contextualizing the Construction and Social Organization of the Commercial Male Sex Industry in London at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century , 2001 .

[2]  P. Ehn,et al.  Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges , 2012, Design Issues.

[3]  Markus Appel,et al.  Otakuism and the Appeal of Sex Robots , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Hannah Frith,et al.  Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue: Using Story Completion Methods in Qualitative Research , 2019, Qualitative Research in Psychology.

[5]  Pengcheng Luo,et al.  Synchronized gesture and speech production for humanoid robots , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Mark Blythe,et al.  The Co-ordinates of Design Fiction: Extrapolation, Irony, Ambiguity and Magic , 2016, GROUP.

[7]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  The Magic Machine Workshops: Making Personal Design Knowledge , 2019, CHI.

[8]  J H Flaskerud,et al.  Use of Vignettes to Elicit Responses toward Broad Concepts , 1979, Nursing research.

[9]  Hannah Frith,et al.  Accounting for orgasmic absence: exploring heterosex using the story completion method , 2013 .

[10]  F. Gregory.  The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory , 1998 .

[11]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse , 2007, CHI.

[12]  C. Rojek.  The Consumerist Syndrome in Contemporary Society , 2004 .

[13]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  How HCI talks about sexuality: discursive strategies, blind spots, and opportunities for future research , 2011, CHI.

[14]  R. Basson.  Human sexual response. , 2015, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[15]  Victoria Clarke,et al.  Therapists' and non-therapists' constructions of heterosex: A qualitative story completion study. , 2018, Psychology and psychotherapy.

[16]  Ray Bert.  Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots , By John Markoff. New York City: Ecco Books, 2015 , 2015 .

[17]  Ross A. Knepper,et al.  Human expectations of social robots , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Designing robots for long-term social interaction , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  C. Campbell.  The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism Oxford: Blackwell , 1989 .

[20]  Stelarc Stelarc.  The Cadaver, the Comatose, and the Chimera: Avatars Have No Organs , 2013 .

[21]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Pleasure is your birthright: digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI , 2011, CHI.

[22]  Gabriele Trovato,et al.  The Influence of Body Proportions on Perceived Gender of Robots in Latin America , 2017, LSR.

[23]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Affective social robots , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Momentary Pleasure or Lasting Meaning?: Distinguishing Eudaimonic and Hedonic User Experiences , 2016, CHI.

[25]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research Fiction: Storytelling, Plot and Design , 2017, CHI.

[26]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The lonely raccoon at the ball: designing for intimacy, sociability, and selfhood , 2014, CHI.

[27]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Defining (Hetero)Sex , 2001 .

[28]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Influences on the Intention to Buy a Sex Robot - An Empirical Study on Influences of Personality Traits and Personal Characteristics on the Intention to Buy a Sex Robot , 2016, LSR.

[29]  Elizabeth A. Buie,et al.  Chatbots of the gods: imaginary abstracts for techno-spirituality research , 2014, NordiCHI.

[30]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[31]  Kate Devlin,et al.  Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots , 2018 .

[32]  Riley Richards,et al.  Exploration of Relational Factors and the Likelihood of a Sexual Robotic Experience , 2016, LSR.

[33]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Design for Sexual Wellbeing in HCI , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[34]  Lily Frank,et al.  Robot sex and consent: Is consent to sex between a robot and a human conceivable, possible, and desirable? , 2017, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[35]  Gavin Wood,et al.  Talk About Sex: Designing Games to Facilitate Healthy Discussions around Sex , 2015, CHI PLAY.

[36]  Andrea Cornwall.  Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. , 2003 .

[37]  Florian Krause,et al.  Dolores and Robot Sex: Fragments of Non-anthropocentric Ethics , 2017, LSR.

[38]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  The influence of robot appearance on assessment , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[39]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Integration of Speech and Action in Humanoid Robots: iCub Simulation Experiments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[40]  Nikki Hayfield,et al.  Looking heteronormatively good! Combining story completion with Bitstrips to explore understandings of sexuality and appearance , 2018, Qualitative Research in Psychology.

[41]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[42]  Wilhelm E. J. Klein,et al.  "Sex robots" revisited: a reply to the campaign against sex robots , 2018, CSOC.

[43]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCI , 2014, CHI.

[44]  S. Raitt.  The Rhetoric of Efficiency in Early Modernism , 2006 .

[45]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good: A Methodological Reflection on Roboethics , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[46]  Oliver Bendel.  SSML for Sex Robots , 2017, LSR.

[47]  Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard,et al.  Intimate Design: Designing Intimacy As a Critical-Feminist Practice , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Robert Bogue.  Shape changing and self-reconfiguring robots , 2015, Ind. Robot.

[49]  Celia Kitzinger,et al.  Engendering Infidelity: Essentialist and Social Constructionist Readings of a Story Completion Task , 1995 .

[50]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  How to approach humans?-strategies for social robots to initiate interaction , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[51]  Kathleen Richardson,et al.  The asymmetrical 'relationship' , 2016, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[52]  Joanne Tippett,et al.  “Think Like an Ecosystem”—Embedding a Living System Paradigm Into Participatory Planning , 2005 .

[53]  Mark Blythe,et al.  The hitchhiker’s guide to ubicomp: using techniques from literary and critical theory to reframe scientific agendas , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[54]  P. Hartvigsen.  The Computer for the 21st Century (1991) , 2014 .

[55]  P. Reynolds.  Between ethics and norms: The problem of normative perceptions of sex and sexuality research , 2019, Journal of the International Network for Sexual Ethics & Politics.

[56]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[57]  Gayle S. Rubin.  Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality , 2012 .

[58]  Giovanni Maria Troiano,et al.  SCI-FI: Shape-Changing Interfaces, Future Interactions , 2016, NordiCHI.

[59]  D. Gauldin.  Deb’s Page: Once Upon a Time… , 1999, Journal of Perinatal Education.

[60]  Ryoko Asai,et al.  Between insanity and love , 2016, SIGCAS Comput. Soc..

[61]  M. Hird.  Gender's nature , 2000 .

[62]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Are we ready for sex robots? , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[63]  Virginia E. Johnson,et al.  Human Sexual Response , 1966 .

[64]  Mike Michael.  How to Understand Mundane Technology: New Ways of Thinking about Human-Technology Relations , 2006 .

[65]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  Robots, Rape, and Representation , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[66]  Partha Pratim Ray,et al.  Internet of Robotic Things: Concept, Technologies, and Challenges , 2016, IEEE Access.

[67]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  Gender and the Media , 2006 .

[68]  Robin Mackenzie.  Sexbots: Sex Slaves, Vulnerable Others or Perfect Partners? , 2018, Int. J. Technoethics.

[69]  Yinong Chen,et al.  Internet of intelligent things and robot as a service , 2013, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[70]  Sociological, Postmodern, and New Realism Perspectives in Social Constructionism: Implications for Literacy Research , 2001 .

[71]  H. Sangani,et al.  DO ANDROIDS DREAM OF ELECTRIC SHEEP? , 2020, Faculty Brat.

[72]  E. Cobley.  Modernism and the Culture of Efficiency: Ideology and Fiction , 2009 .

[73]  Lynne E. Hall.  Sex with Robots for Love Free Encounters , 2016, LSR.

[74]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[75]  A. Sandberg,et al.  4 Should We Campaign Against Sex Robots , 2017 .

[76]  Z. Bauman.  Work, consumerism and the new poor , 1998 .

[77]  E. Wells,et al.  Sexual Scripts among Young Heterosexually Active Men and Women: Continuity and Change , 2013, Journal of sex research.

[78]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2013 .

[79]  Hugh Loebner,et al.  Robot Prostitutes as Alternatives to Human Sex Workers , 2007 .

[80]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[81]  Rebekah Rousi,et al.  Lying Cheating Robots - Robots and Infidelity , 2017, LSR.

[82]  J. Kätsyri,et al.  A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[83]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Thou Shalt Not Covet Another Man? Exploring Constructions of Same‐Sex and Different‐Sex Infidelity Using Story Completion , 2015 .

[84]  Cynthia Breazeal.  Emotive qualities in robot speech , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[85]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[86]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Imaginary Design Workbooks: Constructive Criticism and Practical Provocation , 2018, CHI.

[87]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  What’s in a name? An Online Survey on Gender Stereotyping of Humanoid Social Robots , 2018 .

[88]  W. Green,et al.  Pleasure with Products: Human Factors for Body, Mind and Soul , 1999 .

[89]  John P. Sullins.  Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-robot Relationships , 2010 .

[90]  Denise Oram,et al.  Entertainment Vs Evolution: Cyber Love and relationships, Should We Draw the Line? , 2014, ACE '14 Workshops.

[91]  T. Wilks.  The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research into Social Work Values , 2004 .

[92]  K. Frank.  The Production of Identity and the Negotiation of Intimacy in a `Gentleman's Club' , 1998 .

[93]  John Markoff,et al.  Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots , 2015 .

[94]  John P. Sullins.  Robots, Love, and Sex: The Ethics of Building a Love Machine , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[95]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation , 2012, DIS '12.

[96]  Oliver Bendel.  Sex Robots from the Perspective of Machine Ethics , 2016, LSR.

[97]  E. Janssen,et al.  Factors that Influence Sexual Arousal in Men: A Focus Group Study , 2008, Archives of sexual behavior.

[98]  Richmond Y. Wong,et al.  Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations , 2018, New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction.

[99]  Jason Lee.  Sex Robots: The Future of Desire , 2017 .

[100]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Of Dolls and Men , 2019, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[101]  Greg Wayne,et al.  Canny Minds and Uncanny Questions , 2011, Science.

[102]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Anti-Solutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction , 2016, CHI.

[103]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Toward sociable robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[104]  Nikki Hayfield,et al.  Once upon a time...: Qualitative story completion methods , 2017 .

[105]  C. Müller.  Prometheanism: technology, digital culture and human obsolescence , 2016 .

[106]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Sexbots: the ethical ramifications of social robotics' dark side , 2018, SIGAI.

[107]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences , 2006, UbiComp.

[108]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[109]  Gavin Wood,et al.  "They're Just Tixel Pits, Man": Disputing the 'Reality' of Virtual Reality Pornography through the Story Completion Method , 2017, CHI.

[110]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[111]  Marc Behrendt.  Reflections on Moral Challenges Posed by a Therapeutic Childlike Sexbot , 2017, LSR.

[112]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[113]  Audrey Pope,et al.  Robotic Reflection: An Exploration of Humanity Through the Bodies of Sex Robots , 2018 .

[114]  Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen,et al.  Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions , 2012, CHI.

[115]  David L. Tennenhouse,et al.  Proactive computing , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[116]  K. Hellmann.  Consumerism as a way of life , 2013 .

[117]  Mark Weiser.  The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[118]  Kate Devlin,et al.  In defence of sex machines: why trying to ban sex robots is wrong , 2015 .

[119]  Kathleen Richardson,et al.  Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines , 2016, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[120]  Lone Koefoed Hansen,et al.  PeriodShare: A Bloody Design Fiction , 2016, NordiCHI.

[121]  David Levy,et al.  Why Not Marry a Robot? , 2016, LSR.

[122]  N. Spalding,et al.  Exploring the Use of Vignettes: From Validity to Trustworthiness , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[123]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Robots and Intimacies: A Preliminary Study of Perceptions, and Intimacies with Robots , 2016, LSR.

[124]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[125]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[126]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Robotic Love Rival?: A Quantitative Study on the Jealousy of Women Evoked by other Women and Robots , 2018, APAScience.

[127]  N. Döring,et al.  Sex toys, sex dolls, sex robots: Our under-researched bed-fellows , 2018, Sexologies.

[128]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Sex toys and designing for sexual wellness , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[129]  D. West.  The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation , 2018 .

[130]  Anna C.B. Russell.  Blurring the love lines: The legal implications of intimacy with machines , 2009, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[131]  Christopher Frauenberger,et al.  Research Ethics in HCI: A Town Hall Meeting , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[132]  P. Jordan.  Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[133]  J. Danaher,et al.  Robot Sex. Social and Ethical Implications , 2020, Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung.

[134]  Sophie Wennerscheid,et al.  Posthuman Desire in Robotics and Science Fiction , 2017, LSR.

[135]  Gavin Wood,et al.  Sex Talk: Designing for Sexual Health with Adolescents , 2017, IDC.

[136]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Perceptions and Responsiveness to Intimacy with Robots; A User Evaluation , 2017, LSR.

[137]  Vasile Gheorghita Gaitan,et al.  Integrating robots into the Internet of Things , 2012 .

[138]  R. Arkin,et al.  Robots, Ethics, and Intimacy: The Need for Scientific Research , 2019, Philosophical Studies Series.

[139]  Mark Jones,et al.  Human computer (sexual) interactions , 2004, INTR.

[140]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Sexual interactions: why we should talk about sex in HCI , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[141]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Third-wave HCI, 10 years later---participation and sharing , 2015, Interactions.

[142]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Persuade Into What? Why Human-Computer Interaction Needs a Philosophy of Technology , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[143]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts , 2014, CHI.

[144]  Judeth Oden Choi,et al.  What's at Issue: Sex, Stigma, and Politics in ACM Publishing , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[145]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[146]  James C. Hyatt,et al.  Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs , 2018 .

[147]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .