AHP-Entropy based priority assessment of factors to reduce aviation fuel consumption

ABSTRACTWith the projected air traffic growth, aviation fuel needs will grow by 3% globally per year. Considering this, aviation industry has set ambitious goals to enhance its fuel efficiency. This study presents an integrated framework for aviation fuel consumption reduction, which will also limit its CO2 emissions. Further, this research aims to categorize influential factors and examine their relative importance for fuel-efficient aviation. This study’s theoretical framework combines and reconciles eight major areas: alternative jet fuels, aviation infrastructure, aircraft operations, socio-ecopolitical environment, aircraft design, technology, environmental uncertainty, and strategic changes. In all, 37 sub-factors were identified. The priority ratings of these sub-factors with respect to ‘aviation fuel consumption reduction’ objective is measured by hybrid analytical hierarchy process-entropy method, using pair-wise comparison matrices. The findings attributed the highest importance to ‘technological innovations’, followed by ‘aircraft design’ and ‘aircraft operations’ for saving aviation fuel. Based on the obtained ranking ‘engine design’, ‘laminar flow technology’, and ‘air traffic management technology’ emerged as the three most important sub-factors. The robustness of priority rankings has been tested using sensitivity analysis. This study shows the path for continuous improvement in aviation fuel efficiency by directing efforts and investments on highly important factors.

[1]  Theo K. Dijkstra,et al.  On the extraction of weights from pairwise comparison matrices , 2013, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  E. P. Seregin,et al.  Expansion of fuel resources and saving of fuel for aircraft gas turbine engines , 1980 .

[3]  Kit Fai Pun,et al.  Empirical investigation of the hard and soft criteria of TQM in ISO 9001 certified small and medium‐sized enterprises , 2006 .

[4]  A. N. Sarkar,et al.  Evolving Green Aviation Transport System: A Hoilistic Approah to Sustainable Green Market Development , 2012 .

[5]  Xu Xin,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Smart Grid based on AHP-Entropy Method , 2012 .

[6]  Sunpeth Cumnuantip,et al.  Design and aeroelastic assessment of a forward-swept wing aircraft , 2014 .

[7]  L. Ustinovichius,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods: TOPSIS and SAW , 2010 .

[8]  Faisal Talib,et al.  Prioritising the practices of total quality management: An analytic hierarchy process analysis for the service industries , 2011 .

[9]  Bo Vaaben,et al.  Mitigation of airspace congestion impact on airline networks , 2015 .

[10]  Eike Stumpf,et al.  Conceptual aircraft design with hybrid laminar flow control , 2014 .

[11]  Paul R. Drake,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Engineering Education , 1998 .

[12]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  The influence of emission thresholds and retrofit options on airline fleet planning: An optimization approach , 2018 .

[13]  Philippe A. Bonnefoy,et al.  Air transportation in a carbon constrained world: Long-term dynamics of policies and strategies for mitigating the carbon footprint of commercial aviation , 2011 .

[14]  K. Venkata Rao,et al.  TRIZ Tool for Optimization of Airport Runway , 2009, IFIP CAI.

[15]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  Airline Fuel Usage and Carbon Emissions: Determining Factors , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  K. Lai,et al.  Green Transportation and Energy Consumption in China , 2017 .

[17]  William K. Jaeger,et al.  Biofuel Economics in a Setting of Multiple Objectives & Unintended Consequences , 2011 .

[18]  Philip Lawrence,et al.  Meeting the challenge of aviation emissions: an aircraft industry perspective , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  William L. Sellers,et al.  Riblet drag at flight conditions , 1989 .

[20]  Gene Hou,et al.  Sensitivity analysis method to address user disparities in the analytic hierarchy process , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Ali M. Abdulshahed,et al.  Determination of key performance indicators for measuring airport success: A case study in Libya , 2017 .

[22]  John F. O'Connell,et al.  The economic viability of long-haul low cost operations: Evidence from the transatlantic market , 2015 .

[23]  P.-T. Chuang,et al.  Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Quality Function Deployment for a Location Decision from a Requirement Perspective , 2001 .

[24]  Ramesh K. Agarwal,et al.  Sustainable (Green) Aviation: Challenges and Opportunities , 2009 .

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[26]  Mohammad Hassan Kamfiroozi,et al.  An ERP Selection Combination Model under Uncertainty: A Grey-BSCAHP-Entropy Model , 2014 .

[27]  R. H. Liebeck,et al.  Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport , 2002 .

[28]  Tom G. Reynolds,et al.  Air traffic management performance assessment using flight inefficiency metrics , 2014 .

[29]  Cherie Lu,et al.  The environmental cost implication of hub-hub versus hub by-pass flight networks , 2007 .

[30]  Tong Wang The Research of Electronic Banking Risk Evaluation Based on Comprehensive Assessment AHP-Entropy , 2014 .

[31]  G Kulesa,et al.  WEATHER AND AVIATION: HOW DOES WEATHER AFFECT THE SAFETY AND OPERATIONS OF AIRPORTS AND AVIATION, AND HOW DOES FAA WORK TO MANAGE WEATHER-RELATED EFFECTS? , 2003 .

[32]  Tasos Nikoleris,et al.  Detailed estimation of fuel consumption and emissions during aircraft taxi operations at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 2011 .

[33]  Hailing Wang,et al.  An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[34]  S. Sharma,et al.  Managing Fuel Efficiency in the Aviation Sector: Challenges, Accomplishments and Opportunities , 2018, FIIB Business Review.

[35]  Lilly Spirkovska,et al.  AWE: aviation weather data visualization environment , 2002, Comput. Graph..

[36]  Onder Turan,et al.  Evaluation of Aircraft Descent Profile , 2016 .

[37]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Safety Assessment Model for Dangerous Goods Transport by Air Carrier , 2018 .

[38]  Tim Ryley,et al.  Public Engagement on Aviation Taxes in the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[39]  Raid Al-Aomar,et al.  A COMBINED AHP-ENTROPY METHOD FOR DERIVING SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE CRITERIA WEIGHTS , 2010 .

[40]  Joosung Lee,et al.  Analysis of Technological Innovation and Environmental Performance Improvement in Aviation Sector , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[41]  Włodzimierz Balicki,et al.  Effect of the Atmosphere on the Performances of Aviation Turbine Engines , 2014 .

[42]  Thomas J. Crowe,et al.  Multi‐attribute analysis of ISO 9000 registration using AHP , 1998 .

[43]  Milan Janic,et al.  Analyzing, modeling, and assessing the performances of land use by airports , 2016 .

[44]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Direct carbon dioxide emissions from civil aircraft , 2014, Atmospheric Environment.

[45]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Relationship between fuel consumption and altitude for commercial aircraft during descent: Preliminary assessment with a genetic algorithm , 2012 .

[46]  Giannis Adamos,et al.  Assessing the performance of intermodal city logistics terminals in Thessaloniki , 2017 .

[47]  John W. Drake,et al.  Social, political and economic constraints on airline fuel optimization , 1974 .

[48]  Vishal Sethi,et al.  Hydrogen powered aircraft : The future of air transport , 2013 .

[49]  Joosung J. Lee,et al.  Can we accelerate the improvement of energy efficiency in aircraft systems , 2010 .

[50]  David O'Hare,et al.  Situational and personal characteristics associated with adverse weather encounters by pilots. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[51]  Guangdong Wu,et al.  Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Public Rental Housing Community Based on a Hybrid Method of AHP-Entropy Weight and Cloud Model , 2017 .

[52]  José M. Cansino,et al.  Energy efficiency improvements in air traffic: The case of Airbus A320 in Spain , 2017 .

[53]  Milind Kumar Sharma,et al.  Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach , 2016 .

[54]  Ric Parker,et al.  From blue skies to green skies: engine technology to reduce the climate-change impacts of aviation , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[55]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[56]  Alessandro Gardi,et al.  Real-Time Trajectory Optimisation Models for Next Generation Air Traffic Management Systems , 2014 .

[57]  Tom G. Reynolds,et al.  Green Aircraft Operations , 2015 .

[58]  Nadir Yilmaz,et al.  Sustainable alternative fuels in aviation. , 2017 .

[59]  A. Schäfer,et al.  Costs of mitigating CO2 emissions from passenger aircraft , 2016 .

[60]  Peter McManners,et al.  Developing policy integrating sustainability: A case study into aviation , 2016 .

[61]  Philippe A. Bonnefoy,et al.  The carbon dioxide challenge facing aviation , 2013 .

[62]  Adi Irfan Che-Ani,et al.  Developing weighting system for refurbishment building assessment scheme in Malaysia through analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach , 2018 .

[63]  Cristina Barrado,et al.  Performance measures of the SESAR Southwest functional airspace block , 2016 .

[64]  Mark D. Staples,et al.  Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels , 2018 .

[65]  P. Rietveld,et al.  The impact of climate change and weather on transport: An overview of empirical findings , 2009 .

[66]  Rajib Mall,et al.  Quality assurance of academic websites using usability testing: an experimental study with AHP , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[67]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Fuel burn rates of commercial passenger aircraft: variations by seat configuration and stage distance , 2014 .

[68]  Xavier Prats,et al.  Operating cost based cruise speed reduction for ground delay programs: Effect of scope length , 2014 .

[69]  Simon Blakey,et al.  Aviation gas turbine alternative fuels: A review , 2011 .