Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.

Uncertainty, which is ubiquitous in decision-making, can be fractionated into known probabilities (risk) and unknown probabilities (ambiguity). Although research has illustrated that individuals more often avoid decisions associated with ambiguity compared to risk, it remains unclear why ambiguity is perceived as more aversive. Here we examine the role of arousal in shaping the representation of value and subsequent choice under risky and ambiguous decisions. To investigate the relationship between arousal and decisions of uncertainty, we measure skin conductance response-a quantifiable measure reflecting sympathetic nervous system arousal-during choices to gamble under risk and ambiguity. To quantify the discrete influences of risk and ambiguity sensitivity and the subjective value of each option under consideration, we model fluctuating uncertainty, as well as the amount of money that can be gained by taking the gamble. Results reveal that although arousal tracks the subjective value of a lottery regardless of uncertainty type, arousal differentially contributes to the computation of value-that is, choice-depending on whether the uncertainty is risky or ambiguous: Enhanced arousal adaptively decreases risk-taking only when the lottery is highly risky but increases risk-taking when the probability of winning is ambiguous (even after controlling for subjective value). Together, this suggests that the role of arousal during decisions of uncertainty is modulatory and highly dependent on the context in which the decision is framed. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  Nico H. Frijda Klaus Scherer's article on “What are emotions?” Comments , 2007 .

[2]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[3]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[4]  A. Bechara The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  Karolina M. Lempert,et al.  Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  P. Samuelson A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour , 1938 .

[7]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Adolescents’ risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Lagopoulos Electrodermal activity , 2007, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[9]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[11]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[12]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[13]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[15]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[17]  A. Damasio,et al.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  K. Pribram,et al.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. , 1975, Psychological review.

[20]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[21]  E. Weber,et al.  Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  P. Samuelson A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour: An Addendum , 1938 .

[23]  E. Phelps The study of emotion in neuroeconomics. , 2009 .

[24]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[25]  Karolina M. Lempert,et al.  Neuroeconomics of Emotion and Decision Making , 2014 .

[26]  N. Frijda The laws of emotion. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[27]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity in the Human Brain Relating to Uncertainty and Arousal during Anticipation , 2001, Neuron.

[28]  Sandra F. Lackovic,et al.  Determinants of Propranolol’s Selective Effect on Loss Aversion , 2015, Psychological science.

[29]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  Human Striatal Responses to Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency , 2004, Neuron.

[30]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[31]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Title: the Neural Representation of Subjective Value under Risk and Ambiguity 1 2 , 2009 .

[32]  K. Scherer Psychological models of emotion. , 2000 .

[33]  P. Glimcher Understanding risk: A guide for the perplexed , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  Physiological and behavioral signatures of reflective exploratory choice , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  S. Becker,et al.  What Price Ambiguity? or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision-Making , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[37]  Tim Dalgleish,et al.  Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder, 2nd ed. , 2008 .

[38]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[39]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural activity in the human brain relating to uncertainty and arousal during anticipation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  A. Ohman,et al.  Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[41]  D. Bernoulli Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk , 1954 .

[42]  Dean Mobbs,et al.  What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices , 2012, Cognition.

[43]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .