Choosing to Help Monsters: A Mixed-Method Examination of Meaningful Choices in Narrative-Rich Games and Interactive Narratives

The potential of narrative-rich games to impact emotions, attitudes, and behavior brings with it exciting opportunities and implications within both entertainment and serious game contexts. However, effects are not always consistent, potentially due to game choices not always being perceived as meaningful by the players. To examine these perceptual variations, we used a mixed-method approach. A qualitative study first investigated meaningful game choices from the players' perspectives. Building on the themes developed in this first study, a quantitative study experimentally examined the effect of meaningful game choices on player experiences of appreciation, enjoyment, and narrative engagement. Results highlight the importance of moral, social, and consequential characteristics in creating meaningful game choices, which positively affected appreciation. Meaningfulness of game choices may therefore be crucial for narrative-rich games and interactive narratives to impact players.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Greg Costikyan,et al.  I Have No Words & I Must Design: Toward a Critical Vocabulary for Games , 2002, CGDC Conf..

[3]  David Hodgson,et al.  Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic , 2003 .

[4]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[5]  Matt McCormick.  Is it wrong to play violent video games? , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[6]  Chris Crawford.  Chris Crawford on Interactive Storytelling (New Riders Games) , 2004 .

[7]  C. Crawford.  Chris Crawford on Interactive Storytelling , 2004 .

[8]  Miguel Sicart,et al.  Game, Player, Ethics: A Virtue Ethics Approach to Computer Games , 2005 .

[9]  December,et al.  The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules , 2007 .

[10]  Ian Bogost,et al.  Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames , 2007 .

[11]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[12]  Erika A. Patall,et al.  The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Hua Wang,et al.  Multimodality and Interactivity: Connecting Properties of Serious Games with Educational Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Measuring Narrative Engagement , 2009 .

[15]  D. Gibson,et al.  Ethics and Game Design: Teaching Values Through Play , 2010 .

[16]  Lance Vikaros,et al.  Moral Development through Social Narratives and Game Design , 2010 .

[17]  M. Oliver,et al.  Appreciation as Audience Response: Exploring Entertainment Gratifications beyond Hedonism. , 2010 .

[18]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Nicky Lewis,et al.  Mirrored Morality: An Exploration of Moral Choice in Video Games , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Richard E. Ferdig.  Design, Utilization, and Analysis of Simulations and Game-Based Educational Worlds , 2013 .

[21]  R. Engels,et al.  The benefits of playing video games. , 2014, The American psychologist.

[22]  Thorsten Quandt,et al.  More Than Stories With Buttons: Narrative, Mechanics, and Context as Determinants of Player Experience in Digital Games , 2014 .

[23]  Tanner LeBaron Wallace,et al.  The defining features of teacher talk within autonomy-supportive classroom management , 2014 .

[24]  Lu Wang,et al.  Being Bad in a Video Game Can Make Us Morally Sensitive , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[25]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Interactive Narratives: Processes and Outcomes in User‐Directed Stories , 2014 .

[26]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[27]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Increasing Donating Behavior Through a Game for Change: The Role of Interactivity and Appreciation , 2015, CHI PLAY.

[28]  Dana Ruggiero,et al.  The effect of a persuasive social impact game on affective learning and attitude , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Jonathan A. Smith.  Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , 2006, QMiP Bulletin.

[30]  Carina S. González-González,et al.  Learning healthy lifestyles through active videogames, motor games and the gamification of educational activities , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Negative Emotion, Positive Experience?: Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games , 2016, CHI.

[32]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Appreciation of meaningful entertainment experiences and eudaimonic well-being , 2016 .

[33]  Daniel M. Shafer,et al.  Judgment and Choice: Moral Judgment, Enjoyment and Meaningfulness in Interactive and Non-Interactive Narratives , 2016 .

[34]  Brett Sherrick,et al.  Fun Versus Meaningful Video Game Experiences: A Qualitative Analysis of User Responses , 2017, The Computer Games Journal.

[35]  Brett Sherrick,et al.  Video Games as Meaningful Entertainment Experiences , 2016 .

[36]  Drew P. Cingel,et al.  Moral Foundations Theory and Moral Reasoning in Video Game Play: Using Real-Life Morality in a Game Context , 2016 .

[37]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Those are not the Stories you are Looking For: Using Text Prototypes to Evaluate Game Narratives Early , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[38]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  To Save or To Sacrifice?: Understanding Meaningful Choices in Games , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[39]  José Pablo Zagal,et al.  Meaning without consequence: virtue ethics and inconsequential choices in games , 2017, FDG.

[40]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  Monster Appetite: Effects of Subversive Framing on Nutritional Choices in a Digital Game Environment , 2017, CHI.

[41]  Edward Lank,et al.  Left Them 4 Dead: Perception of Humans versus Non-Player Character Teammates in Cooperative Gameplay , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.