Changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) daily activity patterns in Warsaw during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic, which modified levels of visitor attendance to urban forests and green spaces, provided a unique opportunity to measure the effects of human presence on wild animals and their activity. The aim of our study was to describe how the daily activity pattern of roe deer (i.e. proportion of day- and night-time observations) changed in response to visitor frequency in urban forests of Warsaw in four periods of 2020 (the year the COVID-19 pandemic was announced) compared to the same periods in 2019 (control year). In total, 662 observations of roe deer were recorded by camera traps in both years. The frequency of roe deer observations in urban forests of Warsaw in day- and night-time did not differ between March 2019 and 2020 (period before lockdown, no changes in the number of visitors). Next, between 1 and 20 April 2020 (national lockdown; urban forests were closed for public) the activity of roe deer increased during the day-time. Between 21 April and 30 June in both 2019 and 2020 the frequency of roe deer observations in day and night-time did not differ (green areas were reopened, remote learning). Finally, in July–August 2020 (summer holidays, tourist traffic in forests elevated all day round) the activity of roe deer visibly increased during the night-time. Our research shows how their activity rapidly shifted toward day-time when forests were closed for visitors, and toward night-time when the number of visitors was higher in urban forests after the lockdown. To summarize, roe deer in urban forests showed high ecological plasticity to human presence and rapidly adjusted to changes in the number of visitors in urban forest during the COVID-19 pandemic.

[1]  J. Gryz,et al.  Habitat-Related Differences in Winter Presence and Spring–Summer Activity of Roe Deer in Warsaw , 2021, Forests.

[2]  B. Pokorny,et al.  Roadkill in a time of pandemic: the analysis of wildlife-vehicle collisions reveals the differential impact of COVID-19 lockdown over mammal assemblages , 2021 .

[3]  J. Gryz,et al.  Colonization of Warsaw by the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the years 1976–2019 , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[4]  J. Gryz,et al.  Spatial organization, behaviour and feeding habits of red squirrels: differences between an urban park and an urban forest , 2021 .

[5]  A. Seiler,et al.  COVID-19 related travel restrictions prevented numerous wildlife deaths on roads: A comparative analysis of results from 11 countries , 2021, Biological Conservation.

[6]  L. Brotóns,et al.  Rapid behavioural response of urban birds to COVID-19 lockdown , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[7]  D. Klich,et al.  How Is Wildlife Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic? Lockdown Effect on the Road Mortality of Hedgehogs , 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[8]  F. Shilling,et al.  A Reprieve from US wildlife mortality on roads during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Biological Conservation.

[9]  M. Driessen.  COVID-19 restrictions provide a brief respite from the wildlife roadkill toll , 2021, Biological Conservation.

[10]  O. Berger‐Tal,et al.  iNaturalist insights illuminate COVID-19 effects on large mammals in urban centers , 2021, Biological Conservation.

[11]  R. Montgomery,et al.  Animal Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Quietus , 2020, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[12]  J. Innes,et al.  Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: a global analysis , 2020, Journal of Forestry Research.

[13]  George J. F. Swan,et al.  Urban wildlife in times of COVID-19: What can we infer from novel carnivore records in urban areas? , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[14]  S. Asadi,et al.  Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and its natural environmental impacts , 2020, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[15]  M. Picone,et al.  The good, the bad and the ugly of COVID-19 lockdown effects on wildlife conservation: Insights from the first European locked down country , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[16]  C. Belenguer-Sapiña,et al.  Changes in air pollution during COVID-19 lockdown in Spain: A multi-city study , 2020, Journal of Environmental Sciences.

[17]  Jesse S. Lewis,et al.  What can we learn from wildlife sightings during the COVID‐19 global shutdown? , 2020, Ecosphere.

[18]  Louis Moresi,et al.  Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures , 2020, Science.

[19]  R. Primack,et al.  COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[20]  J. Fattebert,et al.  Trading fear for food in the Anthropocene: How ungulates cope with human disturbance in a multi-use, suburban ecosystem. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  R. Primack,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[22]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  COVID-19 lockdowns cause global air pollution declines , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. Heurich,et al.  Fear of the dark? Contrasting impacts of humans vs lynx on diel activity of roe deer across Europe. , 2019, Journal of Animal Ecology.

[24]  M. Ciach,et al.  Ungulates in the city: light pollution and open habitats predict the probability of roe deer occurring in an urban environment , 2019, Urban Ecosystems.

[25]  Francesco Rovero,et al.  The influence of human disturbance on occupancy and activity patterns of mammals in the Italian Alps from systematic camera trapping , 2017 .

[26]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Fear no colors? Observer clothing color influences lizard escape behavior , 2017, PloS one.

[27]  J. Gryz,et al.  Woodland reserves within an urban agglomeration as important refuges for small mammals , 2017 .

[28]  Viorel D Popescu,et al.  Testing the consistency of wildlife data types before combining them: the case of camera traps and telemetry , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  C. Bertolucci,et al.  Seasonal variation of activity patterns in roe deer in a temperate forested area , 2013, Chronobiology international.

[30]  N. Morellet,et al.  Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer , 2013, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[31]  N. Morellet,et al.  Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[32]  A. Olds,et al.  Potentially negative ecological consequences of animal redistribution on beaches during COVID-19 lockdown , 2021 .

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  O Hammer-Muntz,et al.  PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis version 2.09 , 2001 .

[35]  M. Luniak,et al.  Magpie Pica pica in Warsaw - abundance, distribution and changes in its population , 1997 .