Multi-aperture anomaly detector for clutter background

Without priori information, anomaly detector has more important utility compared with supervised target detection. Many classical anomaly detectors have obtained perfect performance in many situations. However, there still have two problems which are correlated with accuracy of anomaly detector. Firstly, clutter background induced more and more difficult pixel which have moderate statistical difference. Then, ideal uncontaminated subset of clutter background is hard to be obtain which is used to estimate background model. Secondly, difference of spectral content of different background objects will effect salience of anomaly targets. And it is arbitrary that uncertain pixels is nominated as non-anomalies by one threshold. For above two problems, a multi-aperture anomaly detector is proposed in this paper. Without selection of anomaly-free pixels and accurate statistical model, the proposed anomaly detector is expected to decrease false alarm rate with clutter background. A multi-aperture division for hyperspectral cube is conducted by iterative process. Statistical data of ever subaperture will be named as basis, which represent spectral characteristic of a certain range of spectral cube. Then, anomaly salience is proposed to measure the difference between pixels and sub-aperture basis. On the other hand, continuity of membership value based on fuzzy logical theory is more suitable to nominate difficulty pixels which has moderate anomaly salience. At last defuzzification ruler can be used to fuse different detection results from multi-aperture.

[1]  Bo Du,et al.  Random-Selection-Based Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Image enhancement and thresholding by optimization of fuzzy compactness , 1988, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  VARUN CHANDOLA,et al.  Anomaly detection: A survey , 2009, CSUR.

[4]  Qi Wang,et al.  Fast Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection via High-Order 2-D Crossing Filter , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[6]  Marco Diani,et al.  On the CFAR Property of the RX Algorithm in the Presence of Signal-Dependent Noise in Hyperspectral Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  S Matteoli,et al.  A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images , 2010, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[8]  J. Murray-Krezan,et al.  Reduction of false alarms caused by background boundaries in real time subspace RX anomaly detection , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  Mark J. Carlotto,et al.  A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Stefania Matteoli,et al.  An Overview of Background Modeling for Detection of Targets and Anomalies in Hyperspectral Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel RX-algorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Comparative performance analysis of adaptive multispectral detectors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..