A unified framework for 3D radiation therapy and IMRT planning: plan optimization in the beamlet domain by constraining or regularizing the fluence map variations.

The purpose of this work is to demonstrate that physical constraints on fluence gradients in 3D radiation therapy (RT) planning can be incorporated into beamlet optimization explicitly by direct constraint on the spatial variation of the fluence maps or implicitly by using total-variation regularization (TVR). The former method forces the fluence to vary in accordance with the known form of a wedged field and latter encourages the fluence to take the known form of the wedged field by requiring the derivatives of the fluence maps to be piece-wise constant. The performances of the proposed methods are evaluated by using a brain cancer case and a head and neck case. It is found that both approaches are capable of providing clinically sensible 3D RT solutions with monotonically varying fluence maps. For currently available 3D RT delivery schemes based on the use of customized physical or dynamic wedges, constrained optimization seems to be more useful because the optimized fields are directly deliverable. Working in the beamlet domain provides a natural way to model the spatial variation of the beam fluence. The proposed methods take advantage of the fact that 3D RT is a special form of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and finds the optimal plan by searching for fields with a certain type of spatial variation. The approach provides a unified framework for 3D CRT and IMRT plan optimization.

[1]  Ingo Morgenstern,et al.  Fast direct Monte Carlo optimization using the inverse kernel approach , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Luc Beaulieu,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations, wedge filters and field weights for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields. , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  R. Hamilton,et al.  The omni wedge: a method to produce wedged fields at arbitrary orientations. , 1996, Medical physics.

[4]  G. Mageras,et al.  Optimization of collimator trajectory in volumetric modulated arc therapy: development and evaluation for paraspinal SBRT. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  A three-dimensional algorithm for optimizing beam weights and wedge filters. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  Lei Zhu,et al.  SU‐FF‐T‐169: Search for IMRT Inverse Plans with Piece‐Wise Constant Fluence Maps Using Compressed Sensing Techniques , 2009 .

[7]  A L Boyer,et al.  Clinical implementation of wedge filter optimization in three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  I. Kawrakow Improved modeling of multiple scattering in the Voxel Monte Carlo model. , 1997, Medical physics.

[9]  X Allen Li,et al.  Automated computer optimization for 3D treatment planning of breast irradiation. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Optimization of relative weights and wedge angles in treatment planning. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  X. Li,et al.  Automated computer optimization for 3D treatment planning of breast irradiation. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  P S Cho,et al.  Conformal radiotherapy computation by the method of alternating projections onto convex sets. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  G Starkschall,et al.  A constrained least-squares optimization method for external beam radiation therapy treatment planning. , 1984, Medical physics.

[15]  Tae-Suk Suh,et al.  Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  L. Xing,et al.  Aperture modulated arc therapy. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  M. Langer,et al.  Optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J. Dai,et al.  Verification of the super-omni wedge concept. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  R L Siddon,et al.  Effective wedge angles with a universal wedge. , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[22]  Inverse treatment planning and integration of segmentation procedures. , 2008, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[23]  Lei Xing,et al.  Image-Guided and Adaptive Radiation Therapy , 2012 .

[24]  Luc Beaulieu,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations, wedge filters and field weights for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields. , 2004 .

[25]  Lei Xing,et al.  Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques. , 2009, Medical physics.

[27]  Steve Webb,et al.  Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[28]  I. Rosen,et al.  Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. , 1991, Medical physics.

[29]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.