The advantages and downsides of online focus groups for conducting research on addictive online behaviours
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Strang,et al. Could COVID expand the future of addiction research? Long‐term implications in the pandemic era , 2022, Addiction.
[2] V. Starcevic,et al. The Pitfalls of Recycling Substance-Use Disorder Criteria to Diagnose Behavioral Addictions , 2022, Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction.
[3] Daniel L. King,et al. Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study , 2021, Addiction.
[4] Daniel L. King,et al. Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of “other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors”? , 2020, Journal of behavioral addictions.
[5] Daniel L. King,et al. Clarifying terminologies in research on gaming disorder and other addictive behaviors: distinctions between core symptoms and underlying psychological processes. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.
[6] P. Maurage,et al. How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours? , 2017, Addiction.
[7] Daniel Kardefelt-Winther,et al. Lost in the chaos: Flawed literature should not generate new disorders , 2017, Journal of behavioral addictions.
[8] David Stewart,et al. Online Focus Groups , 2017 .
[9] P. Maurage,et al. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research , 2015, Journal of behavioral addictions.
[10] M. Budden. Focus groups: Theory and practice , 1999 .
[11] D. Morgan. Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.
[12] J. Billieux,et al. Internet-use disorders: A theoretical framework for their conceptualization and diagnosis , 2022, Mental Health in a Digital World.
[13] Bojana Lobe,et al. Online Focus Groups , 2010 .
[14] Janet Mancini Billson,et al. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .