Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences for the sustainability of the Brazilian program for biodiesel production and use

The aim of this article is to prioritize the factors and alternatives relating to the reference conditions for the biodiesel production chain for the Brazilian Program for Biodiesel Use and Production. Multicriteria mapping of stakeholders' preferences was used to structure 20 interviews with specialists from Brazil representing three key areas (academy, industry, and regulatory bodies). The methodology started with a review of the literature on the sustainability of the biodiesel production chain based on market data, a review of 138 scientific articles indexed in the CAPES “Web of Science” database, which were searched using “biodiesel” and “sustainability” as keywords, and an analysis of the sustainability criteria used in related legislation and voluntary sustainability initiatives. Next, the reference conditions for the sustainability of the biodiesel production chain were structured, starting with the links and then the factors and their respective impacts and prioritizations given by the stakeholders. The results obtained from all the respondents indicate that the six most critical parameters are: improving the productive capacity of the land, non deforestation, production inputs, land access, engine problems, and land use for food production, which jointly accounted for 55.5% of the total priorities. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 32: 1262–1270, 2013

[1]  Wouter Achten,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India , 2010 .

[2]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition , 2010 .

[3]  Keat Teong Lee,et al.  A visionary and conceptual macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol (TGB) biorefinery in Sabah, Malaysia as an underlay for renewable and sustainable development , 2010 .

[4]  Luciano Basto Oliveira,et al.  Sustainable expansion of electricity sector: Sustainability indicators as an instrument to support decision making , 2010 .

[5]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Net energy and greenhouse gas emission evaluation of biodiesel derived from microalgae. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  L. Das,et al.  Process optimization for biodiesel production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga oils , 2009 .

[7]  Stanislav Miertus,et al.  Development of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels , 2011 .

[8]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of biodiesel production using multicriteria decision‐making , 2009 .

[9]  J. Sheehan Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  Y. Chisti Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[11]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of Brazilian oleaginous crops – possible raw material to produce biodiesel , 2010 .

[12]  Luiz Pereira Ramos,et al.  Current status of biodiesel development in Brazil , 2005, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[13]  Stefan Majer,et al.  Implications of biodiesel production and utilisation on global climate – A literature review , 2009 .

[14]  Siddharth Jain,et al.  Prospects of biodiesel from Jatropha in India: A review , 2010 .

[15]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Can we meet targets for biofuels and renewable energy in transport given the constraints imposed by policy in agriculture and energy , 2010 .

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[17]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  A. Faaij,et al.  Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications , 2008 .

[19]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  Review of Energy Balances and Emissions Associated with Biomass-Based Transport Fuels Relevant to the United Kingdom Context , 2008 .

[20]  Régis Rathmann,et al.  Identification and analysis of local and regional impacts from the introduction of biodiesel production in the state of Piauí , 2009 .

[21]  Guilherme Luís Roehe Vaccaro,et al.  Prospective scenarios for the biodiesel chain of a Brazilian state , 2010 .

[22]  Philip Owende,et al.  Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products , 2010 .

[23]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Catherine Aliana Gucciardi Garcez,et al.  Brazilian Biodiesel Policy: Social and environmental considerations of sustainability , 2009 .

[25]  Wilson Parawira,et al.  Biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas: A review , 2010 .

[26]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Biofuel potential production from the Orbetello lagoon macroalgae : A comparison with sunflower feedstock , 2008 .

[27]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences in regulating nanotechnology , 2010, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[28]  Timothy J. Wallington,et al.  Impact of biofuel production and other supply and demand factors on food price increases in 2008 , 2011 .

[29]  May ChooYuen,et al.  Life cycle assessment for the production and use of palm biodiesel (Part 5). , 2010 .