Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis

This paper proposes a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function to model energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation. This approach allows for the consideration of the group heterogeneity of electricity generation, non-radial slacks, and undesirable outputs simultaneously. We extend several standardized indices to measure total-factor energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance, and technology gaps in electricity generation. We estimate the potential reductions in energy use and CO2 emissions under different technology assumptions. We conduct an empirical analysis of fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea by using the proposed approach. The results indicate that coal-fired power plants show higher levels of total-factor energy efficiency and CO2 emission performance than oil-fired ones. Under the meta-frontier technology assumption, coal-fired power plants show a smaller technology gap than oil-fired ones. This suggests that the Korean government should promote technological innovation to reduce technology gaps for oil-fired plants, thereby improving energy and CO2 emission performance and meeting emission reduction targets in the electricity generation industry.

[1]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  M. Lee,et al.  The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[4]  Xiaohua Xia,et al.  Energy abatement in Chinese industry: Cost evaluation of regulation strategies and allocation alternatives , 2012 .

[5]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[7]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[8]  William L. Weber,et al.  A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency , 2009 .

[9]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[10]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants , 2008 .

[11]  S. Managi,et al.  The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks : non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output , 2012 .

[12]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: An empirical study of China , 2010 .

[13]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Matthew J. Eckelman,et al.  Long-term trends of electric efficiencies in electricity generation in developing countries , 2009 .

[15]  Corrado Di Maria,et al.  Efficiency, Productivity and Environmental Policy: A Case Study of Power Generation in the EU , 2010 .

[16]  L. Hiebert,et al.  The Determinants of the Cost Efficiency of Electric Generating Plants: A Stochastic Frontier Approach , 2002 .

[17]  Hojeong Park,et al.  Valuation of marginal CO2 abatement options for electric power plants in Korea , 2009 .

[18]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  M. Lee,et al.  Potential cost savings from internal/external CO2 emissions trading in the Korean electric power industry , 2011 .

[20]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Eco-efficiency of the world cement industry: A data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[21]  Giorgia Oggioni,et al.  Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function , 2012 .

[22]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Trend in efficiency and capacity of fossil power generation in the EU , 2009 .

[23]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[24]  Ching-Ren Chiu,et al.  Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output , 2012 .

[25]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance , 2008 .

[26]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Modal choice between air and rail: a social efficiency benchmarking analysis that considers CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[27]  Sue J. Lin,et al.  Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[28]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[29]  Dong-hyun Oh A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index , 2010 .

[30]  T. Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA radial measurement for environmental assessment and planning: Desirable procedures to evaluate fossil fuel power plants , 2012 .

[31]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Potential for reducing global carbon emissions from electricity production—A benchmarking analysis , 2011 .

[32]  P. Zhou,et al.  Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure , 2012 .

[33]  Adnan Sözen,et al.  Assessment of operational and environmental performance of the thermal power plants in Turkey by using data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[34]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA-Discriminant Analysis (DA) , 2012 .

[35]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[36]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[37]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[38]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Ecological total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China , 2012 .

[39]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants , 2010 .