COMPARISON OF PANSHARPENING ALGORITHMS FOR COMBINING RADAR AND MULTISPECTRAL DATA

Iconic image fusion is a technique that is used to combine the spatial structure of a high resolution panchromatic image with the spectral information of a lower resolution multispectral image to produce a high resolution multispectral image. This process is often referred to as pansharpening. In this study, image data of the new RADAR satellite TerraSAR-X are used to sharpen optical multispectral data. To produce these images, use is made of the Ehlers fusion, a fusion technique that is developed for preserving maximum spectral information. The Ehlers Fusion is modified to integrate radar data with optical data. The results of the modified Ehlers fusion are compared with those of other standard fusion techniques such as Brovey, Principal Component, and with recently developed fusion techniques such as Gram-Schmidt, UNB, wavelet based fusion and CN-Spectral Sharpening. The evaluation is based on the verification of the preservation of spectral characteristics and the improvement of the spatial resolution. The results show that most of the fusion methods are not capable to integrate TerraSAR-X data into multispectral data without color distortions. The result is confirmed by statistical analysis.

[1]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multisensor image fusion techniques in remote sensing , 1991 .

[2]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  A low computational-cost method to fuse IKONOS images using the spectral response function of its sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  S. Sides,et al.  Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data: Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic , 1991 .

[4]  S. Klonus,et al.  Image Fusion Using the Ehlers Spectral Characteristics Preservation Algorithm , 2007 .

[5]  E. Ricchetti,et al.  Visible?infrared and radar imagery fusion for geological application: A new approach using DEM and sun-illumination model , 2001 .

[6]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Introduction of sensor spectral response into image fusion methods. Application to wavelet-based methods , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Data Fusion. Definitions and Architectures - Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolutions , 2002 .

[10]  Xavier Otazu,et al.  Multiresolution-based image fusion with additive wavelet decomposition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Demonstration of the accuracy of improved-resolution hyperspectral imagery , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Manfred Ehlers.  Spectral characteristics preserving image fusion based on Fourier domain filtering , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[13]  W. A. Hallada,et al.  Image sharpening for mixed spatial and spectral resolution satellite systems , 1983 .

[14]  J. Zhou,et al.  A wavelet transform method to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic data , 1998 .

[15]  Youcef Chibani,et al.  Integration of panchromatic and SAR features into multispectral SPOT images using the ‘à trous’ wavelet decomposition , 2007 .

[16]  W. Cao,et al.  The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-4/C7 CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL AND SAR FUSION IMAGE USING FUZZY KNOWLEDGE AND OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM , 2010 .