A 2-hour diagnostic protocol for possible cardiac chest pain in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE Patients with chest pain represent a high health care burden, but it may be possible to identify a patient group with a low short-term risk of adverse cardiac events who are suitable for early discharge. OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of a rapid diagnostic pathway with a standard-care diagnostic pathway for the assessment of patients with possible cardiac chest pain in a usual clinical practice setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-center, randomized parallel-group trial with blinded outcome assessments was conducted in an academic general and tertiary hospital. Participants included adults with acute chest pain consistent with acute coronary syndrome for whom the attending physician planned further observation and troponin testing. Patient recruitment occurred from October 11, 2010, to July 4, 2012, with a 30-day follow-up. INTERVENTIONS An experimental pathway using an accelerated diagnostic protocol (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction score, 0; electrocardiography; and 0- and 2-hour troponin tests) or a standard-care pathway (troponin test on arrival at hospital, prolonged observation, and a second troponin test 6-12 hours after onset of pain) serving as the control. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Discharge from the hospital within 6 hours without a major adverse cardiac event occurring within 30 days. RESULTS Fifty-two of 270 patients in the experimental group were successfully discharged within 6 hours compared with 30 of 272 patients in the control group (19.3% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.18-3.13; P = .008). It required 20 hours to discharge the same proportion of patients from the control group as achieved in the experimental group within 6 hours. In the experimental group, 35 additional patients (12.9%) were classified as low risk but admitted to an inpatient ward for cardiac investigation. None of the 35 patients received a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome after inpatient evaluation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Using the accelerated diagnostic protocol in the experimental pathway almost doubled the proportion of patients with chest pain discharged early. Clinicians could discharge approximately 1 of 5 patients with chest pain to outpatient follow-up monitoring in less than 6 hours. This diagnostic strategy could be easily replicated in other centers because no extra resources are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12610000766011.

[1]  R. Troughton,et al.  A 2-hour thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score outperforms other risk stratification tools in patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndromes: comparison of chest pain risk stratification tools. , 2012, American heart journal.

[2]  J. Alpert,et al.  Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .

[3]  W. Gibler,et al.  Prolonged emergency department stays of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients are associated with worse adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management and increased adverse events. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  William Parsonage,et al.  Introduction of an accelerated diagnostic protocol in the assessment of emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome: The Nambour Short Low‐Intermediate Chest pain project , 2013, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[5]  Mike Bradburn,et al.  The Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac Markers (RATPAC) trial: a randomised controlled trial of point-of-care cardiac markers in the emergency department , 2010, Heart.

[6]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  James McCord,et al.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[8]  J. Hollander,et al.  Assessment of the standardized reporting guidelines ECG classification system: the presenting ECG predicts 30-day outcomes. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  W. Gibler,et al.  Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of ED patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[10]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Schriger,et al.  Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. , 2008, Annals of Emergency Medicine.

[12]  J. Alpert,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[13]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. , 2010, European heart journal.

[14]  R. Troughton,et al.  A new improved accelerated diagnostic protocol safely identifies low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  A. Singer,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care troponin I assay for acute myocardial infarction within 3 hours after presentation in early presenters to the emergency department with chest pain. , 2012, American heart journal.

[16]  Astrid Guttmann,et al.  Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  P. Crosland NICE: Chest pain of recent onset , 2016, British Journal of Cardiac Nursing.

[18]  Jesse M Pines,et al.  The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[19]  J. Hollander,et al.  Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[20]  A. Brown,et al.  Comprehensive standardized data definitions for acute coronary syndrome research in emergency departments in Australasia , 2010, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[21]  R Ruthazer,et al.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[23]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Jesse M Pines,et al.  Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[26]  James McCord,et al.  Ninety-Minute Exclusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction By Use of Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing of Myoglobin and Troponin I , 2001, Circulation.

[27]  C. Reid,et al.  A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study , 2011, The Lancet.

[28]  C. Reid,et al.  Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  S Capewell,et al.  The health care burden of acute chest pain , 2005, Heart.

[30]  G. Jelinek,et al.  The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[31]  D. Moher,et al.  Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  J. Hollander,et al.  The continuing search to identify the very-low-risk chest pain patient. , 1999, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[34]  C. Reid,et al.  2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  A. Furber,et al.  Appropriateness of Diagnostic Management and Outcomes of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.