DIGITIZING RADIOGRAPHIC FILMS: A SIMPLE WAY TO EVALUATE INDIRECT DIGITAL IMAGES

Objectives: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. Methods: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. Results: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. Conclusions: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations.

[1]  M W Vannier,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of digital dental radiograph imaging systems. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[2]  T. Teslow,et al.  The laser film digitizer: Density, contrast, and resolution , 1997, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  J P Felmlee,et al.  An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  M W Vannier,et al.  35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[5]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Digitisation and display of intra-oral films. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Homero Schiabel,et al.  Computer technique for digital radiographic images correction based on the digitizer characteristic curve. , 2002, Journal of digital imaging.

[7]  M W Vannier,et al.  35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  R. Schulze,et al.  Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin. , 2002, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  S K Chen,et al.  Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.