Effects of ON-Hours Versus OFF-Hours Admission on Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is highly complex, and outcomes may depend on the time of hospital admission and subsequent intervention (ie, ON-hours versus OFF-hours). The CULPRIT-SHOCK trial (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) demonstrated superior outcome for culprit-lesion-only versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, multivessel disease, and cardiogenic shock. However, it is unknown whether the time of hospital admission affects the overall outcome of these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed patients from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial with respect to the time of hospital admission. We divided patients in ON-hours and OFF-hours groups and further stratified them according to their individual revascularization strategy. Outcome measures consisted of a composite end point of death or renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and mortality within 1 year. Results: Out of 686 patients randomized in the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial, 444 patients (64.7%) presented during ON-hours, whereas 242 patients (35.3%) presented during OFF-hours. Death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days occurred to a similar extent in patients admitted during ON-hours (51.0%) and OFF-hours (50.0%; P=0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality was not affected by the time of hospital admission (54.4% ON-hours versus 51.7% OFF-hours, P=0.49). Regardless of admission time, patients had a benefit from culprit-lesion-only as compared to immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. The composite end point at 30 days occurred in 45.1% versus 57.6% of patients admitted ON-hours and in 47.7% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (Pinteraction=0.29). Death within 1 year occurred in 49.4% versus 60.0% of patients admitted during ON-hours and in 51.4% versus 51.9% of patients admitted OFF-hours (Pinteraction=0.20). Conclusions: Among patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, the risk of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days, and mortality at 1 year did not differ significantly according to the time of hospital admission. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01927549.

[1]  G. Dukic,et al.  European , 2020, Definitions.

[2]  G. Helft,et al.  On- Versus Off-Hours Presentation and Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  K. Fox,et al.  Association between time of hospitalization with acute myocardial infarction and in-hospital mortality , 2019, European heart journal.

[4]  M. Mohammad,et al.  Culprit vessel: impact on short-term and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction , 2018, Open Heart.

[5]  H. Thiele,et al.  One‐Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  E. Omerovic,et al.  Prognosis is similar for patients who undergo primary PCI during regular‐hours and off‐hours: A report from SCAAR* , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  H. Thiele,et al.  Impact of Off-Hours Versus On-Hours Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Myocardial Damage and Clinical Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  T. Friede,et al.  Impact of treatment delay on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with and without haemodynamic instability: results from the German prospective, multicentre FITT-STEMI trial , 2018, European heart journal.

[9]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[10]  H. Thiele,et al.  PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  G. Schuler,et al.  Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. , 2016, American heart journal.

[12]  Gavin D Perkins,et al.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. , 2015, Resuscitation.

[13]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Kristine M. Thompson,et al.  Off-hour presentation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  G. Schuler,et al.  Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac magnetic resonance substudy of the AIDA STEMI trial. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Swaminathan,et al.  Nonsystem reasons for delay in door-to-balloon time and associated in-hospital mortality: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Impact of transfer time on mortality in acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation treated by angioplasty. , 2012, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[18]  L. Maier,et al.  Reduction in treatment times through formalized data feedback: results from a prospective multicenter study of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  Alan C. Wilson,et al.  Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  A. Germing Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction , 2007 .

[21]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.