The representation of complex soil variation on wavelet packet bases

The discrete wavelet packet transform (DWPT) is an advanced wavelet technique that has distinct advantages over the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) previously used in soil science. Because the DWT divides the spatial frequencies of the data into non-uniform intervals, it may fail to resolve features of the spatial variation that a simpler spectral analysis might identify under stationary conditions. However, the DWPT allows us to retain the advantages of the DWT (particularly the lack of stationarity assumptions) while achieving much better resolution in the spatial frequency domain. This is at the cost of poorer spatial resolution at the higher frequencies. However, by selecting a best wavelet packet basis from among the many possible, according to some appropriate criterion, we can find a compromise between frequency and spatial resolution that is best suited to the representation of our particular data set. In this paper, I describe a number of analyses based on the DWPT and apply them to two data sets on the soil. The advantages of the DWPT with best basis selection are clearly illustrated. In particular, non-stationary behaviour of a significant periodic component of variation was identified that could not be effectively resolved by the DWT. Improved resolution in the frequency domain allowed aspects of the non-stationary variation of soil to be resolved in a multiresolution analysis (MRA) adapted to the variation of the data.

[1]  R. Lark,et al.  Analysing spatially intermittent variation of nitrous oxide emissions from soil with wavelets and the implications for sampling , 2004 .

[2]  I. Daubechies Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1988 .

[3]  Alice E. Milne,et al.  Wavelet analysis of the scale‐ and location‐dependent correlation of modelled and measured nitrous oxide emissions from soil , 2005 .

[4]  Alice E. Milne,et al.  Scale‐ and location‐dependent correlation of nitrous oxide emissions with soil properties: an analysis using wavelets , 2004 .

[5]  G. Battle Heisenberg Inequalities for Wavelet States , 1997 .

[6]  M. Vannucci,et al.  Wavelet Packet Methods for the Analysis of Variance of Time Series With Application to Crack Widths on the Brunelleschi Dome , 2004 .

[7]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Richard Webster,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Gilgai Soil , 1977 .

[9]  Donald P. Percival,et al.  On estimation of the wavelet variance , 1995 .

[10]  R. Webster,et al.  Filtering SPOT imagery by kriging analysis , 2000 .

[11]  Peter Guttorp,et al.  Long-Memory Processes, the Allan Variance and Wavelets , 1994 .

[12]  Carl Taswell,et al.  Satisficing search algorithms for selecting near-best bases in adaptive tree-structured wavelet transforms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Richard E. Farrell,et al.  Scale‐Dependent Relationship between Wheat Yield and Topographic Indices , 2004 .

[14]  Richard Webster,et al.  Analysing soil variation in two dimensions with the discrete wavelet transform , 2004 .

[15]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Changes in variance and correlation of soil properties with scale and location: analysis using an adapted maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform , 2001 .

[16]  A. Walden,et al.  The phase–corrected undecimated discrete wavelet packet transform and its application to interpreting the timing of events , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Analysis and elucidation of soil variation using wavelets , 1999 .