Strategies to evaluate the impact of rectal volume on prostate motion during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer*

Objective To evaluate the rectal volume influence on prostate motion during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Fifty-one patients with prostate cancer underwent a series of three computed tomography scans including an initial planning scan and two subsequent scans during 3D-CRT. The organs of interest were outlined. The prostate contour was compared with the initial CT images considering the anterior, posterior, superior, inferior and lateral edges of the organ. Variations in the anterior limits and volume of the rectum were assessed and correlated with prostate motion in the anteroposterior direction. Results The maximum range of prostate motion was observed in the superoinferior direction, followed by the anteroposterior direction. A significant correlation was observed between prostate motion and rectal volume variation (p = 0.037). A baseline rectal volume superior to 70 cm3 had a significant influence on the prostate motion in the anteroposterior direction (p = 0.045). Conclusion The present study showed a significant interfraction motion of the prostate during 3D-CRT with greatest variations in the superoinferior and anteroposterior directions, and that a large rectal volume influences the prostate motion with a cutoff value of 70 cm3. Therefore, the treatment of patients with a rectal volume > 70 cm3 should be re-planned with appropriate rectal preparation.

[1]  J. Buatti,et al.  Analysis of interfraction prostate motion using megavoltage cone beam computed tomography. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  X. Li,et al.  Characterizing interfraction variations and their dosimetric effects in prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Impact of image guidance on outcomes after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  H. O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 1975 .

[5]  T. Byrne,et al.  A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2005, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[6]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D. Nori,et al.  Influence of volumes of prostate, rectum, and bladder on treatment planning CT on interfraction prostate shifts during ultrasound image-guided IMRT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[10]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy , External Beam Radiation Therapy , or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer , 2000 .

[11]  Steven J Frank,et al.  Quantification of prostate and seminal vesicle interfraction variation during IMRT. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Sean S. Park,et al.  Adaptive image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) eliminates the risk of biochemical failure caused by the bias of rectal distension in prostate cancer treatment planning: clinical evidence. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Chris Beltran,et al.  Planning target margin calculations for prostate radiotherapy based on intrafraction and interfraction motion using four localization methods. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J A Antolak,et al.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D. Low,et al.  A critical evaluation of the planning target volume for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.