An Analysis of Teleoperator Performance in Conditions of Display-Control Misalignments With and Without Movement Cues

During robot teleoperations, misalignments occur when the coordinates of the manipulated end effector viewed through a remote camera are incongruent with the fixed coordinates at the hand controller. Such display-control misalignments are frequently encountered in present-day manually controlled robotic systems, such as space station manipulators or mobile manipulators for military operations and surgical robots with which the remote worksite is viewed from an exocentric camera. Misalignments are known to degrade operator performance and thus far have been dealt with by extensive operator training or by system-specific compensatory algorithms. The results presented demonstrate that the time to produce translational and rotational movements on an end effector viewed through an exocentric camera varies significantly with misalignment and follows patterns similar to those found in mental rotation studies of misaligned shapes. The authors show that overlaying color-coded augmented-reality movement cues on the end effector and mapping them to a color-coded hand controller significantly shorten the processing time required to translate or rotate a misaligned end effector across a range of angular misalignments. Furthermore, the cues make response times invariant to misalignment for both translational and rotational movements. Although these cues were intended for space station manipulators, their application in other teleoperation platforms, such as surgical robots or remote ground vehicles, is possible.

[1]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Rotated object identification with and without orientation cues. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[2]  E. C. Poulton,et al.  Tracking skill and manual control , 1974 .

[3]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The Effect of Automated Compensation for Incongruent Axes on Teleoperator Performance , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[6]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Rotation and translation mechanisms for tabletop interaction , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[7]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  Control Performance With Three Translational Degrees of Freedom , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Richard De Lisi,et al.  Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance , 1996 .

[9]  Rainer K. Bernotat,et al.  Rotation of Visual Reference Systems and Its Influence on Control Quality , 1970 .

[10]  I. Cherney Mom, Let Me Play More Computer Games: They Improve My Mental Rotation Skills , 2008 .

[11]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[12]  Brice Isableu,et al.  Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  M. Hinder,et al.  The efficacy of colour cues in facilitating adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  E. Forward Perception and Motion , 1963 .

[15]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Perceptual Distortions Produce Multidimensional Stress Profiles in Novice Users of an Endoscopic Surgery Simulator , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Won S. Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional tracking with misalignment between display and control axes , 1991 .

[17]  Abhilash Pandya,et al.  Improved Telemanipulator Navigation During Display-Control Misalignments Using Augmented Reality Cues , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[18]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Anisotropic human performance in six degree-of-freedom tracking: an evaluation of three-dimensional display and control interfaces , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[19]  Alan Natapoff,et al.  Influence of perspective-taking and mental rotation abilities in space teleoperation , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A multisensory approach to spatial updating: the case of mental rotations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  H. Cunningham Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.