The potential for nature-based solutions to combat the freshwater biodiversity crisis

Enthusiasm for and investments in nature-based solutions (NBS) as sustainable strategies for climate adaptation and infrastructure development is building among governments, the scientific community, and engineering practitioners. This is particularly true for water security and water-related risks. In a freshwater context, NBS may provide much-needed “win-wins” for society and the environment that could benefit imperiled freshwater biodiversity. Such conservation benefits are urgently needed given the ongoing freshwater biodiversity crisis, with declines in freshwater species and their habitats occurring at more than twice the rate of marine or terrestrial systems. However, for NBS to make meaningful contributions to safeguarding freshwater biodiversity, clear links must be established between NBS applications and priorities for conservation. In this paper, we link common water-related NBS to six priority actions for freshwater life established by the conservation science n community, and highlight priority research and knowledge that will be necessary to bring NBS to bear on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. In particular, we illustrate how NBS can play a direct role in restoring degraded aquatic and floodplain ecosystems, enhancing in-stream water quality, and improving hydrological connectivity among freshwater ecosystems. System-level monitoring is needed to ensure that freshwater NBS deliver on their promised benefits for ecosystems and species.

[1]  J. Olden,et al.  People need freshwater biodiversity , 2023, WIREs Water.

[2]  D. Nelson,et al.  Operationalizing equity for integrated water resources management , 2022, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

[3]  S. Sorlini,et al.  Constructed Wetlands as a Solution for Sustainable Sanitation: A Comprehensive Review on Integrating Climate Change Resilience and Circular Economy , 2022, Water.

[4]  D. Dodman,et al.  “It won’t work here”: Lessons for just nature-based stream restoration in the context of urban informality , 2022, Environmental Science & Policy.

[5]  D. Sear,et al.  Nature‐based solutions enhance sediment and nutrient storage in an agricultural lowland catchment , 2022, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

[6]  Vanessa Hull,et al.  Community-based fish sanctuaries: untapped potential for freshwater fish conservation , 2022, Oryx.

[7]  J. Chappell,et al.  Highlighting assumptions of community engagement in urban stream restoration , 2022, Freshwater Science.

[8]  P. Roebeling,et al.  Modelling Impacts of Nature-Based Solutions on Surface Water Quality: A Rapid Review , 2022, Sustainability.

[9]  A. Gericke,et al.  The potential of large floodplains to remove nitrate in river basins - The Danube case. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  J. Opperman,et al.  Nature-based solutions for managing rising flood risk and delivering multiple benefits , 2022, One Earth.

[11]  Rebekah D. Wallace,et al.  A framework to integrate innovations in invasion science for proactive management , 2022, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  A. Rosemond,et al.  A strategic monitoring approach for learning to improve natural infrastructure. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  J. Lund,et al.  Restoring Rivers and Floodplains for Habitat and Flood Risk Reduction: Experiences in Multi-Benefit Floodplain Management From California and Germany , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[14]  R. Balasubramanian,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Reclamation and Reuse of Wastewater and Urban Stormwater: A Review , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[15]  V. Lecours,et al.  A new index to quantify longitudinal river fragmentation: Conservation and management implications , 2022, Ecological Indicators.

[16]  Brian K. Hand,et al.  A review of invasive species reporting apps for citizen science and opportunities for innovation , 2022, NeoBiota.

[17]  Jonathan M. Gomes-Selman,et al.  Reducing adverse impacts of Amazon hydropower expansion , 2022, Science.

[18]  Samuel J. Brenkman,et al.  Reconnecting the Elwha River: Spatial Patterns of Fish Response to Dam Removal , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[19]  A. Ojala,et al.  Urban Wetlands: A Review on Ecological and Cultural Values , 2021, Water.

[20]  Jeffrey T. Tyson,et al.  Considering aquatic connectivity trade-offs in Great Lakes barrier removal decisions , 2021, Journal of Great Lakes Research.

[21]  N. Kranjčić,et al.  Role of Natural Capital Economics for Sustainable Management of Earth Resources , 2021, Earth.

[22]  R. Shaw,et al.  Nexus between Water Security Framework and Public Health: A Comprehensive Scientific Review , 2021, Water.

[23]  R. Clémençon.  Is sustainable development bad for global biodiversity conservation? , 2021, Global Sustainability.

[24]  T. Bridges,et al.  Engineering With Nature : An Atlas, Volume 2 , 2021 .

[25]  M. Motallebi,et al.  Understanding the public's behavior in adopting green stormwater infrastructure , 2021, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[26]  D. W. Manning,et al.  Conservation Across Aquatic-Terrestrial Boundaries: Linking Continental-Scale Water Quality to Emergent Aquatic Insects and Declining Aerial Insectivorous Birds , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[27]  B. Mishra,et al.  Water Security in a Changing Environment: Concept, Challenges and Solutions , 2021, Water.

[28]  Pete Smith,et al.  Getting the message right on nature‐based solutions to climate change , 2021, Global change biology.

[29]  T. Grantham,et al.  Human stabilization of river flows is linked with fish invasions across the USA , 2021 .

[30]  S. Adams,et al.  Review of Dam Effects on Native and Invasive Crayfishes Illustrates Complex Choices for Conservation Planning , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[31]  K. Hobson,et al.  Nutritional consequences of breeding away from riparian habitats in Bank Swallows: new evidence from multiple endogenous markers , 2021, Conservation physiology.

[32]  Alison J. Fairbrass,et al.  Integrating Natural Capital into National Accounts: Three Decades of Promise and Challenge , 2021, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[33]  P. McIntyre,et al.  A network of grassroots reserves protects tropical river fish diversity , 2020, Nature.

[34]  A. Pezzoli,et al.  Addressing Challenges of Urban Water Management in Chinese Sponge Cities via Nature-Based Solutions , 2020, Water.

[35]  R. Hughes,et al.  Integrated terrestrial-freshwater planning doubles conservation of tropical aquatic species , 2020, Science.

[36]  Dick de Zwart,et al.  Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[37]  Ahmed Akl Mahmoud,et al.  Water Quality Improvement and Pollutant Removal by Two Regional Detention Facilities with Constructed Wetlands in South Texas , 2020 .

[38]  P. Herman,et al.  Seagrass coastal protection services reduced by invasive species expansion and megaherbivore grazing , 2020, Journal of Ecology.

[39]  Lara Domínguez,et al.  Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense of the Environment , 2020, Land.

[40]  J. Olden,et al.  Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan , 2020, Bioscience.

[41]  Fangfang Zhu,et al.  Interpretation and application of Sponge City guidelines in China , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[42]  A. Magurran,et al.  Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis , 2020, Ambio.

[43]  N. Seddon,et al.  Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[44]  M. Monaghan,et al.  Safeguarding freshwater life beyond 2020: Recommendations for the new global biodiversity framework from the European experience , 2020, Conservation Letters.

[45]  K. Parris,et al.  Review: Toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity , 2019, Ecosphere.

[46]  M. Dixon,et al.  Loss of Potential Aquatic-Terrestrial Subsidies Along the Missouri River Floodplain , 2019, Ecosystems.

[47]  T. E. Lovejoy,et al.  A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets , 2019, Science Advances.

[48]  R. T. Belote,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large-landscape conservation , 2019, Biological Conservation.

[49]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Do riparian forest strips in modified forest landscapes aid in conserving bat diversity? , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[50]  Laura S. Craig,et al.  Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come? , 2019, Bioscience.

[51]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[52]  N. Poff.  Beyond the natural flow regime? Broadening the hydro‐ecological foundation to meet environmental flows challenges in a non‐stationary world , 2018 .

[53]  Todd S. Bridges,et al.  Engineering With Nature : An Atlas , 2018 .

[54]  Jared G. Underwood,et al.  Landscape genetics identifies streams and drainage infrastructure as dispersal corridors for an endangered wetland bird , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[55]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018) , 2018, Front. Environ. Sci..

[56]  K. Forshay,et al.  Floodplain restoration increases hyporheic flow in the Yakima River Watershed, Washington. , 2018, Ecological engineering.

[57]  B. Richter,et al.  Critical Factors for Water Policy to Enable Effective Environmental Flow Implementation , 2018, Front. Environ. Sci..

[58]  L A Schifman,et al.  Situating Green Infrastructure in Context: A Framework for Adaptive Socio‐Hydrology in Cities , 2017, Water resources research.

[59]  Michelle M. Horath,et al.  Response of aquatic vegetation communities and other wetland cover types to floodplain restoration at Emiquon Preserve , 2017, Hydrobiologia.

[60]  V. Martínez‐Fernández,et al.  Dismantling artificial levees and channel revetments promotes channel widening and regeneration of riparian vegetation over long river segments , 2017 .

[61]  W. Ligtvoet,et al.  Overcoming water challenges through nature-based solutions , 2017 .

[62]  E. Larsen,et al.  Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services , 2017 .

[63]  David L. Smith,et al.  Levee Setbacks: An Innovative, Cost Effective, and Sustainable Solution for Improved Flood Risk management , 2017 .

[64]  W. Darwall,et al.  Disappearing giants: a review of threats to freshwater megafauna , 2017 .

[65]  R. Hall,et al.  Riparian proper functioning condition assessment to improve watershed management for water quality , 2017, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[66]  R. McDonald,et al.  Watershed-scale impacts of stormwater green infrastructure on hydrology, nutrient fluxes, and combined sewer overflows in the mid-Atlantic region. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[67]  A. Kouba,et al.  The significance of droughts for hyporheic dwellers: evidence from freshwater crayfish , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[68]  T. Grantham,et al.  Dam removal and anadromous salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) conservation in California , 2015, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[69]  Nikolai Sindorf,et al.  Development of new indicators to evaluate river fragmentation and flow regulation at large scales: A case study for the Mekong River Basin , 2014 .

[70]  D. Kleijn,et al.  Waterbirds increase more rapidly in Ramsar-designated wetlands than in unprotected wetlands , 2014 .

[71]  P. Hamel,et al.  Source-control stormwater management for mitigating the impacts of urbanisation on baseflow: A review , 2013 .

[72]  D. Osmond,et al.  Groundwater nitrate reductions within upstream and downstream sections of a riparian buffer , 2012 .

[73]  M. Okbah,et al.  Environmental monitoring of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates and physicochemical characteristics of seawater in El-Mex Bay (Alexandria, Egypt) , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[74]  I. Chaubey,et al.  Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research , 2012, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[75]  Zhaoyin Wang,et al.  Distribution and species composition of macroinvertebrates in the hyporheic zone of bed sediment , 2012 .

[76]  S. Levin,et al.  Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  F. Nakamura,et al.  Fish habitat rehabilitation using wood in the world , 2010, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[78]  Jesse R. O’Hanley,et al.  Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis , 2010 .

[79]  D. Mudappa,et al.  Asian Elephant Elephas Maximus Habitat Use and Ranging in Fragmented Rainforest and Plantations in the Anamalai Hills, India , 2010 .

[80]  Bruce McKenney,et al.  Ecologically Functional Floodplains: Connectivity, Flow Regime, and Scale 1 , 2010 .

[81]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  T. Beechie,et al.  Global Review of the Physical and Biological Effectiveness of Stream Habitat Rehabilitation Techniques , 2008 .

[83]  Keith E. Dennett,et al.  Wetland Simulation Model for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediments Retention in Constructed Wetlands , 2007 .

[84]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Conservation easements in context: a quantitative analysis of their use by The Nature Conservancy , 2007 .

[85]  E. Stanley,et al.  Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages , 2006 .

[86]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[87]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[88]  C. Revelle,et al.  A multiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin , 2005 .

[89]  Mike Acreman,et al.  Linking science and decision-making: features and experience from environmental river flow setting , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[90]  A. Merenlender,et al.  Use of Riparian Corridors and Vineyards by Mammalian Predators in Northern California , 2004 .

[91]  G. Guthey,et al.  Land Trusts and Conservation Easements: Who Is Conserving What for Whom? , 2004 .

[92]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[93]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[94]  Peter B. Moyle,et al.  California's Yolo Bypass: Evidence that flood control Can Be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture , 2001 .

[95]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  John R. Jones,et al.  Flooding to Restore Connectivity of Regulated, Large-River Wetlands Natural and controlled flooding as complementary processes along the lower Missouri River , 1998 .

[97]  Jan Vymazal,et al.  Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[98]  C. A. Howell,et al.  Wildlife Response to Riparian Restoration on the Sacramento River , 2008 .

[99]  R. van der Brugge,et al.  Transforming water infrastructure by linking water management and urban renewal in Rotterdam , 2008, 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA).

[100]  I. Baird,et al.  Strength in diversity: fish sanctuaries and deep-water pools in Lao PDR , 2006 .

[101]  Klement Tockner,et al.  The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system , 1999 .

[102]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .