Bacterial genotyping by 16S rRNA mass cataloging

BackgroundIt has recently been demonstrated that organism identifications can be recovered from mass spectra using various methods including base-specific fragmentation of nucleic acids. Because mass spectrometry is extremely rapid and widely available such techniques offer significant advantages in some applications. A key element in favor of mass spectrometric analysis of RNA fragmentation patterns is that a reference database for analysis of the results can be generated from sequence information. In contrast to hybridization approaches, the genetic affinity of any unknown isolate can in principle be determined within the context of all previously sequenced 16S rRNAs without prior knowledge of what the organism is. In contrast to the original RNase T1 cataloging method, when digestion products are analyzed by mass spectrometry, products with the same base composition cannot be distinguished. Hence, it is possible that organisms that are not closely related (having different underlying sequences) might be falsely identified by mass spectral coincidence. We present a convenient spectral coincidence function for expressing the degree of similarity (or distance) between any two mass-spectra. Trees constructed using this function are consistent with those produced by direct comparison of primary sequences, demonstrating that the inherent degeneracy in mass spectrometric analysis of RNA fragments does not preclude correct organism identification.ResultsNeighbor-joining trees for important bacterial pathogens were generated using distances based on mass spectrometric observables and the spectral coincidence function. These trees demonstrate that most pathogens will be readily distinguished using mass spectrometric analyses of RNA digestion products. A more detailed, genus-level analysis of pathogens and near relatives was also performed, and it was found that assignments of genetic affinity were consistent with those obtained by direct sequence comparisons. Finally, typical values of the coincidence between organisms were also examined with regard to phylogenetic level and sequence variability.ConclusionCluster analysis based on comparison of mass spectrometric observables using the spectral coincidence function is an extremely useful tool for determining the genetic affinity of an unknown bacterium. Additionally, fragmentation patterns can determine within hours if an unknown isolate is potentially a known pathogen among thousands of possible organisms, and if so, which one.

[1]  S. Goodison,et al.  16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Sebastian Böcker,et al.  High-throughput MALDI-TOF discovery of genomic sequence polymorphisms. , 2003, Genome research.

[3]  F Hillenkamp,et al.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI) of endonuclease digests of RNA. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  R Amann,et al.  The identification of microorganisms by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. , 2001, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[5]  Sebastian Böcker,et al.  Base-specific fragmentation of amplified 16S rRNA genes analyzed by mass spectrometry: A tool for rapid bacterial identification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Martin Förster,et al.  RNaseCut: a MALDI mass spectrometry-based method for SNP discovery. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  H. W. Schaup,et al.  The use of ribonuclease U2 in RNA sequence determination , 1974, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[8]  Cristina Battaglia,et al.  Bacterial discrimination by means of a universal array approach mediated by LDR (ligase detection reaction) , 2002, BMC Microbiology.

[9]  T. Macke,et al.  A phylogenetic definition of the major eubacterial taxa. , 1985, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[10]  NIAID Biodefense Research Agenda for CDC Category A Agents , 2003 .

[11]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..

[12]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Niels Storm,et al.  RNase T1 mediated base-specific cleavage and MALDI-TOF MS for high-throughput comparative sequence analysis. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  C R Woese,et al.  The phylogeny of prokaryotes. , 1980, Microbiological sciences.

[15]  John M Koomen,et al.  Accurate mass measurement of DNA oligonucleotide ions using high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2002, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[16]  E. Delong,et al.  Phylogenetic stains: ribosomal RNA-based probes for the identification of single cells. , 1989, Science.

[17]  K. Prasad,et al.  A comparative evaluation of phenotypic and molecular methods for the detection of oxacillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci , 2004, Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy.

[18]  A. Oskooi Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics , 2008 .

[19]  David J. Ecker,et al.  TIGER: the universal biosensor , 2005 .

[20]  Jef Rozenski,et al.  The RNA Modification Database: 1999 update , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[22]  Hubert Köster,et al.  DNA diagnostic based on mass spectrometry , 1997 .

[23]  Nan Yu,et al.  The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  N. Pace,et al.  Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Franz Hillenkamp,et al.  Reverse Sanger sequencing of RNA by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry after solid phase purification. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Rangarajan Sampath,et al.  Rapid identification and strain-typing of respiratory pathogens for epidemic surveillance , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[28]  Howard Ochman,et al.  Identification and phylogenetic sorting of bacterial lineages with universally conserved genes and proteins. , 2004, Environmental microbiology.

[29]  C. Woese,et al.  Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  James R. Cole,et al.  The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  George E. Fox,et al.  Comparative Cataloging of 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid: Molecular Approach to Procaryotic Systematics , 1977 .

[32]  C. Cantor,et al.  DNA sequencing and genotyping by transcriptional synthesis of chain-terminated RNA ladders and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  S. Martin,et al.  DNA sequencing by delayed extraction-matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the identification and characterisation of prokaryotes. , 2003, Current opinion in microbiology.

[36]  Darrell P. Chandler,et al.  Sequence versus Structure for the Direct Detection of 16S rRNA on Planar Oligonucleotide Microarrays , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  C J Morrison,et al.  Rapid and unequivocal differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from other Candida species using species-specific DNA probes: comparison with phenotypic identification methods. , 2003, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[38]  Sebastian Böcker,et al.  Novel Mass Spectrometry-Based Tool for Genotypic Identification of Mycobacteria , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[39]  Richard C. Willson,et al.  Microbial identification by mass cataloging , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  C. Woese,et al.  Conservation of primary structure in 16S ribosomal RNA , 1975, Nature.