Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties

Abstract Here we report on the impacts of organic solvent properties, reaction conditions, and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane separation performance, film structure, and interfacial properties. We provide direct experimental evidence that: (1) MPD diffusivity in the organic phase governs MPD–TMC thin film water permeability, (2) MPD diffusivity and solubility influence MPD–TMC thin film crosslinking in competing ways, (3) water permeability correlates most strongly with MPD–TMC film structure (i.e., crosslinking), and (4) salt rejection correlates most strongly with MPD–TMC film thickness and morphology. Overall, higher flux membranes with good salt rejection appear to comprise thinner, more heavily crosslinked film structures. Such high performance RO membranes are obtained by (1) selecting high surface tension, low viscosity solvents, (2) controlling protonation of MPD and hydrolysis of TMC during interfacial polymerization, and (3) optimizing curing temperature and time based on organic solvent volatility. Finally, although more research is necessary, our results suggest the rugose morphology and relative hydrophobicity of high performance MPD–TMC membranes might enhance concentration polarization and exacerbate surface fouling.

[1]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes: An optimized manufacturing method , 2005 .

[2]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  S. Kwak,et al.  Use of atomic force microscopy and solid-state NMR spectroscopy to characterize structure-property-performance correlation in high-flux reverse osmosis (RO) membranes , 1999 .

[4]  S. Srebnik,et al.  Mathematical model of charge and density distributions in interfacial polymerization of thin films , 2003 .

[5]  C. V. Devmurari,et al.  Structure–performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: effect of coating conditions on film formation , 2003 .

[6]  Shih-Hsiung Chen,et al.  Preparation and separation properties of polyamide nanofiltration membrane , 2002 .

[7]  C. Wilke,et al.  Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions , 1955 .

[8]  S. Kwak,et al.  Structure-motion-performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  S. H. Kim,et al.  Positron annihilation spectroscopic evidence to demonstrate the flux-enhancement mechanism in morphology-controlled thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  In-Chul Kim,et al.  Effect of aqueous and organic solutions on the performance of polyamide thin‐film‐composite nanofiltration membranes , 2002 .

[11]  Paul W. Morgan,et al.  Condensation polymers: by interfacial and solution methods , 1965 .

[12]  Marcel Mulder,et al.  Basic Principles of Membrane Technology , 1991 .

[13]  Jong-Gyu Kim,et al.  The changes of membrane performance with polyamide molecular structure in the reverse osmosis process , 2000 .

[14]  Viatcheslav Freger,et al.  Nanoscale Heterogeneity of Polyamide Membranes Formed by Interfacial Polymerization , 2003 .

[15]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes , 2007 .

[16]  Paul W. Morgan,et al.  Interfacial polycondensation. I. , 1959 .

[17]  R. Rangarajan,et al.  Interfacially synthesized thin film composite RO membranes for seawater desalination , 1997 .

[18]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[19]  S. Kwolek.  Commentary: Reflections on “interfacial polycondensation. II. Fundamentals of polymer formation at liquid interfaces,” by Paul W. Morgan and Stephanie L. Kwolek, J. Polym. Sci., XL, 299 (1959) , 1996 .

[20]  Norman N. Li,et al.  Flux Enhancement in TFC RO Membranes , 2001 .

[21]  V. Freger.  Kinetics of film formation by interfacial polycondensation. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Effect of Membrane Surface Roughness on Colloid−Membrane DLVO Interactions , 2003 .

[23]  P. Morgan,et al.  Interfacial polycondensation. II. Fundamentals of polymer formation at liquid interfaces , 1959 .