User-producer relations, innovation and the evolution of market structures under alternative contractual regimes

In this paper we examine the effects that user-producer interactions have on innovation and the dynamics of market structure of two vertically related industries under alternative contractual regimes. The existence of advantages stemming from users-producers relationships introduces a dynamic "matching" problem between firms characterized by heterogeneous capabilities and imperfect information who act in a continuously changing environment but are however able to improve their products also through interactive and interdependent learning processes. Our results highlight the subtle trade-offs and dynamic interdependencies that arise in these contexts. In particular, we show that: (a) a trade-off is present between the exploitation of past experience and the exploration of new suppliers; (b) externalities are present, even if the advantages arising from interactions do not spill over to other firms; (c) imperfect information and agents heterogeneity are crucial factors in determining the consequences of alternative contractual arrangements on industry dynamics; (d) vertical interdependencies propagate the effects of specific firms' decisions across industries and over time, so that the resulting dynamics is characterized by interacting path-dependent processes.

[1]  M. Valente,et al.  Technological change and the vertical organization of industries , 2008 .

[2]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[3]  S. Winter,et al.  Vertical Integration and Dis-integration of Computer Firms: A History Friendly Model of the Co-evolution of the Computer and Semiconductor Industries , 2008 .

[4]  S. Winter,et al.  Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences , 2007 .

[5]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[6]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[7]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[8]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: towards a history‐friendly model , 2002 .

[9]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  User-Producer Interaction, Learning and Comparative Advantage , 1993 .

[10]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  special issue: The economic contribution of information technology: Towards comparative and user studies , 2001 .

[11]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[12]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[13]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[14]  M. Aoki Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm , 2013 .

[15]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving , 2005 .

[16]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[17]  Paul Windrum,et al.  The outsourcing productivity paradox: total outsourcing, organisational innovation, and long run productivity growth , 2009 .

[18]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[20]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[21]  A. Morrison,et al.  Innovation and the geographical and organisational dimensions of outsourcing: Evidence from Italian firm-level data , 2009 .

[22]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .