Standards, innovation, and latecomer economic development: Conceptual issues and policy challenges

Abstract Little is known about the impact of standards on the economic development of countries which are latecomers to industrial manufacturing and innovation. Standardization is regarded primarily as a technical issue, and hence receives only limited high-level policy support. However, technical standards contribute at least as much as patents to economic growth. As a key mechanism for the diffusion of technological knowledge and due to the dominant leadership by advanced countries in patenting, technical standards have emerged in latecomer countries as an alternative to patenting. However, latecomer countries and their firms have a set of capabilities and constraints that are fundamentally different from that of advanced countries and firms. This paper argues that latecomer countries should adopt assessment criteria that are more fitted with latecomer contexts which emphasize learning effects and building dynamic capabilities. The paper discusses current issues that are essential in understanding the rise of Asian countries in standardization. We also examine the critical role that patents play for standardization and argue that “strategic patenting” to generate rents from de facto industry standards can stifle latecomer economic development.

[1]  Heejin Lee,et al.  The evolution of alliance structure in China's mobile telecommunication industry and implications for international standardization , 2012 .

[2]  Mark A. Lemley.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations , 2002 .

[3]  P. Goldstein,et al.  Intellectual Property in Asia. Law, Economics, History and Politics , 2009 .

[4]  L. Jordan,et al.  Flexible Implementation: A Key to Asia's Transformation , 2014 .

[5]  Victor Stango.  The Economics of Standards Wars , 2004 .

[6]  Mark A. Lemley.  Ten Things to do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To) , 2006 .

[7]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Government coordination of conflicting interests in standardisation: case studies of indigenous ICT standards in China and South Korea , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[9]  J. Palfrey,et al.  Fostering Innovation and Trade in the Global Information Society: The Different Facets and Roles of Interoperability , 2011 .

[10]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  The economics of electronics industry : competitive dynamics and industrial organization , 2000 .

[11]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Economics Of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy , 2004 .

[12]  Baisheng An.  Intellectual Property Rights in Information and Communications Technology Standardization: High-Profile Disputes and Potential for Collaboration between the United States and China , 2009 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[14]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Strategic Technology Agreements and Market Structure, The Case of GSM , 2002 .

[15]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Complexity and Internationalization of Innovation: Why is Chip Design Moving to Asia , 2005 .

[16]  D. Grewal.  Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization , 2008 .

[17]  W. Ping,et al.  Standardization Strategy of China, Achievements and Challenges , 2010 .

[18]  Willow A. Sheremata.  Competing Through Innovation in Network Markets: Strategies for Challengers , 2004 .

[19]  T. Khanna,et al.  Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets , 1997 .

[20]  Walter Mattli,et al.  Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? , 2003 .

[21]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking , 2006 .

[22]  V. Balzani,et al.  Scenarios for the Future , 2013 .

[23]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[24]  Andrew S. Grove,et al.  Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career , 1996 .

[25]  C. Kindleberger.  Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods , 1983 .

[26]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[27]  Y. Furukawa.  Intellectual property protection and innovation: an inverted-U relationship , 2010 .

[28]  Akira Goto,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-Up , 2010 .

[29]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design , 2005 .

[30]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Korea's Strategies for ICT Standards Internationalisation: A Comparison with China's , 2012, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[31]  D. Ernst,et al.  Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion and Local Capability Formation , 2002 .

[32]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[33]  W. Baumol,et al.  Economics--principles and policy , 1979 .

[34]  Michael B. Spring,et al.  Selected intellectual property issues in standardization , 2000 .

[35]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[36]  R. Hunt,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights and Standard Setting in Financial Services: The Case of the Single European Payments Area , 2007 .

[37]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  A New Geography of Knowledge in the Electronics Industry? Asia's Role in Global Innovation Networks , 2009 .

[38]  G. Tassey.  Standardization in technology-based markets , 2000 .

[39]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries , 2002 .