Sustainable and Equitable Increases in Fruit and Vegetable Productivity and Consumption are Needed to Achieve Global Nutrition Security

Increased intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) is recommended for most populations across the globe. However, the current state of global and regional food systems is such that F&V availability, the production required to sustain them, and consumer food choices are all severely deficient to meet this need. Given the critical state of public health and nutrition worldwide, as well as the fragility of the ecological systems and resources on which they rely, there is a great need for research, investment, and innovation in F&V systems to nourish our global population. Here, we review the challenges that must be addressed in order to expand production and consumption of F&V sustainably and on a global scale. At the conclusion of the workshop, the gathered participants drafted the “Aspen/Keystone Declaration” (see below), which announces the formation of a new “Community of Practice,” whose area of work is described in this position paper. The need for this work is based on a series of premises discussed in detail at the workshop and summarized herein. To surmount these challenges, opportunities are presented for growth and innovation in F&V food systems. The paper is organized into five sections based on primary points of intervention in global F&V systems: (1) research and development, (2) information needs to better inform policy & investment, (3) production (farmers, farming practices, and supply), (4) consumption (availability, access, and demand), and (5) sustainable & equitable F&V food systems and supply chains. The Aspen/Keystone Declaration A new Community of Practice has formed with a shared mission to synthesize data and generate the knowledge needed to better inform actions and interventions leading to more diverse, equitable, nutritious, resilient, and sustainable global F&V food systems. Position Paper: Sustainable & Equitable Increases in F&V Needed for Global Nutrition Security 3 The graphic on this flyer was produced by Ellie Barber of the Aspen Global Change Institute to help summarize the desirable food system outcomes discussed at the workshop. The side-event mentioned in this flyer showcased workshop outcomes and was held alongside the 2018 Global Climate Action Summit. Prepared comments from the panelists were followed by Q&A and interactions with the 40 gathered participants. Position Paper: Sustainable & Equitable Increases in F&V Needed for Global Nutrition Security 4 Background & Introduction To improve public health and nutrition, populations across the globe must consume more F&V on a daily basis.1 However, the current state of global and regional food systems is such that both F&V availability and the production required to sustain them are severely deficient to meet this need (Miller et al., 2016; Bahadur et al., 2018). While innovations in technology and production methods can improve production efficiency and increase the yield of F&V systems, yield alone is insufficient to guarantee crop nutritional quality, system sustainability, and F&V access and demand by consumers. Research has shown that there is tremendous variation in F&V consumption across the world; however, in general, the majority of the world’s population consumes far fewer F&V than recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and this is related to numerous poor health outcomes (Hall, Moore, Harper et al. 2009, Casagrande, Wang, Anderson et al. 2007). One of the major leading causes for poor health and disease worldwide is poor diet (Lim et al., 2012) and accordingly six of the top nine global diseases risk factors are linked to poor dietary quality (Forouzanfar et al., 2015). Approximately 16.0 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs), and 1.7 million deaths worldwide are related to low F&V consumption (WHO, 2018). F&V are among the few food groups with positive outcomes for both undernutrition (e.g. micronutrient deficiencies) and overnutrition (e.g. cardiovascular disease, overweight and obesity). According to the United Nations State of Food Insecurity in the World 2017 report (FAO., 2017), 815 million people suffered from calorie deficit hunger in 2016. Micronutrient deficiencies afflict many more people throughout the world—estimated at over 2 billion—while roughly one-third of the global population is overweight or obese (Ng et al., 2014; WHO, 2018 ). Approximately one-third of women of reproductive age are anemic, mainly due to iron deficiency, and one in four children suffer from stunting due to malnutrition in the first 1000 days post-conception2 (from the womb to two years of age) (SOFA, 2018 ). Consumption of sufficient F&V per day (a minimum of 400g, according to the WHO) has been consistently shown to reduce risk of many chronic diseases, including multiple gastrointestinal cancers, cardiovascular disease, and stroke (Jansen 2001;WHO 2005). A systematic review of studies relating F&V consumption to reduced rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and premature death (Aune et al. 2017) found that there were significant benefits to intake of up to 500 g fruit/day and 800 g vegetables/day (twice the WHO minimum recommended intake level) and that 13.4 million3 premature deaths per year could be prevented globally by increasing population-level F&V consumption. At the same time, because F&V production uses significant quantities of natural resources, it is imperative that their consumption is aligned with production levels to prevent the waste of natural resources. Additionally, because of their perishability, F&V are the second most wasted food product category after seafood in many countries (NRDC, 2017). When F&V are diverted to the garbage instead of eaten they contribute to increases in greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions in the 1 As a quick word of initial explanation, this document has not been edited to the standards of a peerreviewed journal. Many declarative statements, such as this one, have not been referenced. But many have been, and there are more than six pages of references. This document was “crowd-sourced” by the workshop participants (all of whom volunteered their time). A more tightly edited and shorter version will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal soon. In the meantime, this report will be made available to others (via the AGCI web-site), as the first of the tangible workshop outputs and in order to facilitate next steps (e.g. proposals). 2 While increased F&V consumption is generally understood to be beneficial during the first 1000 days, the greater need in some regions may actually be for higher amounts of animal-based foods in the diet. 3 It should be noted there is considerable variation in the literature on this number. Position Paper: Sustainable & Equitable Increases in F&V Needed for Global Nutrition Security 5 process of decomposition. Food system transformations are needed to ensure closer linkages between producers and consumers, in order to improve such alignment. Globally, public investments in F&V systems pale in comparison to major cereal crops. The World Vegetable Center, an international agricultural research institution dedicated to research and development for vegetable crops, spends approximately $20 million/year, as compared to roughly $920 million/year by the CGIAR system, which is devoted primarily to staples and has no specific F&V component.4 This represents a global public investment of only 3-5% in vegetable breeding and systems relative to total expenditures on staple grains and other heavily-traded commodities produced in the Global South (World Vegetable Center, 2018). It is important to note that there are strong private sector investments in F&V systems in both the Global North and the Global South, particularly in the area of hybrid and commercially-important vegetables (e.g., tomato, onion, pepper, lettuce, cucumber) and fruits (e.g., orange, apple, pineapple, mango, banana). There is also an opportunity for greater investment in additional crops that are not currently commercial targets, including regional or indigenous species and varieties. As the global trend towards urbanization shrinks farming populations (in most areas) and increases the distance between production and consumption, ensuring continued access to locallysourced F&V becomes more daunting. Urban and rural poor alike increasingly have greater access – through both lower price points and heightened marketing and sales – to ultra-processed, highsugar foods produced from commodity crops than they do to fresh produce. Cumulatively, these diet-related factors contribute to the triple burden of malnutrition—combined underweight, overweight, and micronutrient deficiencies—across populations in both the Global North and Global South. Additional challenges for sustainably producing enough F&V to achieve global nutrition security include a growing global population (PRB, 2017), a degraded and contaminated resource base due to current production practices, increasing competition for freshwater resources, and a changing climate. Given the critical state of public health and nutrition worldwide, as well as the fragility and constraints of the ecological systems and resources on which they rely, there is a great need for research, investment, and innovation in F&V systems to nourish our global population. Here, we review the challenges that must be addressed in order to expand production and consumption of F&V sustainably and on a global scale. To surmount these challenges, we subsequently present opportunities for growth and innovation in F&V systems. The paper is organized into five sections based on primary points of intervention in global F&V systems: (1) research and development, (2) information needs to better inform policy & investment, (3) production (farmers, farming practices, and supply), (4) consumption (availability, access, and demand), and (5) sustainable and equitable F&V food systems and supply chains. 4 In noting these figures, it is acknowledged that the total glob

[1]  L. Drinkwater,et al.  Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Reduced tillage and increasing cropping intensity in the Great Plains conserves soil C , 1998 .

[3]  M. Altieri The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems , 1999 .

[4]  M. Jansen Fruits and vegetables and the risk of epithelial cancer , 2001 .

[5]  D. Guyonnet,et al.  Mechanisms of protection against aflatoxin B(1) genotoxicity in rats treated by organosulfur compounds from garlic. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[6]  S. Ogle,et al.  Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils - Effects of no-tillage , 2002 .

[7]  C. Stöckle,et al.  CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model , 2003 .

[8]  M. Blanke,et al.  Food (miles) for Thought - Energy Balance for Locally-grown versus Imported Apple Fruit (3 pp) , 2005, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[9]  Total and Labile Soil Organic Matter in Organic and Conventional Farming Systems , 2006 .

[10]  M. Hauschild Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA , 2006 .

[11]  Danielle G. Lemay,et al.  A multi‐ontology framework to guide agriculture and food towards diet and health , 2007 .

[12]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Comparing domestic versus imported apples: A focus on energy use , 2007, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[13]  C. Shennan Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[15]  M. Burke,et al.  Solar-powered drip irrigation enhances food security in the Sudano–Sahel , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Lobell,et al.  Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980 , 2011, Science.

[17]  S. Vanek Legume-Phosphorus Synergies In Mountain Agroecosystems: Field Nutrient Balances, Soil Fertility Gradients, And Effects On Legume Attributes And Nutrient Cycling In The Bolivian Andes , 2011 .

[18]  B. Popkin Agricultural policies, food and public health , 2011, EMBO reports.

[19]  C. Field,et al.  California perennial crops in a changing climate , 2011 .

[20]  C. Thomson,et al.  A systematic review of behavioral interventions to promote intake of fruit and vegetables. , 2011, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[21]  R. Saftner,et al.  Organically versus conventionally grown produce: common production inputs, nutritional quality, and nitrogen delivery between the two systems. , 2011, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[22]  J. Burney,et al.  Smallholder Irrigation as a Poverty Alleviation Tool in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2012 .

[23]  C. Hawkes,et al.  Linking agricultural policies with obesity and noncommunicable diseases: A new perspective for a globalising world , 2012 .

[24]  S. Pfister,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory and Carbon and Water FoodPrint of Fruits and Vegetables: Application to a Swiss Retailer , 2012, Environmental Science and Technology.

[25]  Wesley W. Ingwersen,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica , 2012 .

[26]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[27]  W. Willett,et al.  Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications , 2013, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[28]  Hankui K. Zhang,et al.  Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data , 2013 .

[29]  James W. Jones,et al.  Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[31]  Gregory A Keoleian,et al.  Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  James W. Jones,et al.  The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and Pilot Studies , 2013 .

[33]  A. S. Grandy,et al.  Crop rotation complexity regulates the decomposition of high and low quality residues , 2014 .

[34]  M. Gómez,et al.  Localization effects for a fresh vegetable product supply chain: Broccoli in the eastern United States , 2014 .

[35]  Michael R. Springborn,et al.  Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action , 2014, Agriculture & Food Security.

[36]  B. Cardinale,et al.  REVIEW: Do polycultures promote win‐wins or trade‐offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta‐analysis , 2014 .

[37]  J. Pretty,et al.  Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. , 2014, Annals of botany.

[38]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Life cycle assessment of vegetable products: a review focusing on cropping systems diversity and the estimation of field emissions , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  María José Amores,et al.  Improvement of agricultural life cycle assessment studies through spatial differentiation and new impact categories: case study on greenhouse tomato production. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  A. S. Grandy,et al.  Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[42]  N. Mueller,et al.  Leverage points for improving global food security and the environment , 2014, Science.

[43]  M. Mazzocchi,et al.  Importance of government policies and other influences in transforming global diets. , 2014, Nutrition reviews.

[44]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2014, The Lancet.

[45]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  K. Narayan,et al.  Do We Produce Enough Fruits and Vegetables to Meet Global Health Need? , 2014, PloS one.

[47]  Konstantinos V Kotsanopoulos,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (ISO 14040) Implementation in Foods of Animal and Plant Origin: Review , 2014, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[48]  C. Sundberg,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of diets–combining environmental and nutritional aspects , 2015 .

[49]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Assessing global dietary habits: a comparison of national estimates from the FAO and the Global Dietary Database , 2015, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[50]  P. Pingali Agricultural policy and nutrition outcomes – getting beyond the preoccupation with staple grains , 2015, Food Security.

[51]  Chi-Tang Ho,et al.  Dietary allicin reduces transformation of L-carnitine to TMAO through impact on gut microbiota , 2015 .

[52]  A. S. Grandy,et al.  Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[53]  Board on Agriculture,et al.  A Framework for Assessing Effects of the Food System , 2015 .

[54]  Peter Fantke,et al.  The Glasgow consensus on the delineation between pesticide emission inventory and impact assessment for LCA , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[55]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[56]  Anthony G Williams,et al.  The impact of healthier dietary scenarios on the global blue water scarcity footprint of food consumption in the UK , 2015 .

[57]  A. Cerutti,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Fruit Sector , 2015 .

[58]  S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The United States food supply is not consistent with dietary guidance: evidence from an evaluation using the Healthy Eating Index-2010. , 2015, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[59]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Seven Food System Metrics of Sustainable Nutrition Security , 2016 .

[60]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) Model: A New Method for Estimating the Global Dietary Supply of Nutrients , 2016, PloS one.

[61]  K. Appleton,et al.  Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions , 2016, European Journal of Nutrition.

[62]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  The shared and unique values of optical, fluorescence, thermal and microwave satellite data for estimating large-scale crop yields. , 2016 .

[63]  A. Aimone,et al.  The intersection of climate/environment, food, nutrition and health: crisis and opportunity. , 2017, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[64]  S. Asseng,et al.  Baseline simulation for global wheat production with CIMMYT mega-environment specific cultivars , 2017 .

[65]  E. Riboli,et al.  Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[66]  P. Schreinemachers,et al.  Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables , 2017 .

[67]  K. Kimmel,et al.  Benefits of increasing plant diversity in sustainable agroecosystems , 2017 .

[68]  Ryan E. Galt,et al.  Transitions to Agroecological Nutrient Management Practices in the USA Corn Belt , 2017 .

[69]  M. Bindi,et al.  Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[70]  John M. Antle,et al.  Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: State of agricultural systems science , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[71]  S. Robinson,et al.  Mitigation potential and global health impacts from emissions pricing of food commodities , 2017 .

[72]  E. Marshall,et al.  Nutritional Sustainability: Aligning Priorities in Nutrition and Public Health with Agricultural Production. , 2017, Advances in nutrition.

[73]  Sarah J. McLaren,et al.  The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges , 2017 .

[74]  E. S. Jensen,et al.  Does intercropping enhance yield stability in arable crop production? A meta-analysis , 2017 .

[75]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers , 2018, Science.

[76]  Shaowen Wang,et al.  A high-performance and in-season classification system of field-level crop types using time-series Landsat data and a machine learning approach , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[77]  Evan D. G. Fraser,et al.  When too much isn’t enough: Does current food production meet global nutritional needs? , 2018, PloS one.

[78]  M. Niles,et al.  Relationship between food waste, diet quality, and environmental sustainability , 2018, PloS one.

[79]  Christian J Peters,et al.  Capacity of the US Food System to Accommodate Improved Diet Quality: A Biophysical Model Projecting to 2030 , 2018, Current developments in nutrition.

[80]  T. Hess,et al.  The exposure of a fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain to global water-related risks , 2018, Water International.

[81]  E. Todd,et al.  A Review on the Rising Prevalence of International Standards: Threats or Opportunities for the Agri-Food Produce Sector in Developing Countries, with a Focus on Examples from the MENA Region , 2018, Foods.

[82]  W. Willett,et al.  Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits , 2018, Nature.

[83]  Jian Peng,et al.  STAIR: A generic and fully-automated method to fuse multiple sources of optical satellite data to generate a high-resolution, daily and cloud-/gap-free surface reflectance product , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[84]  A. Mathys,et al.  Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems , 2018, Nature Communications.

[85]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail , 2018, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[86]  J. Blesh,et al.  Crop rotations for increased soil carbon: perenniality as a guiding principle. , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[87]  Joseph S. Salama,et al.  The Global Nutrient Database: availability of macronutrients and micronutrients in 195 countries from 1980 to 2013 , 2018, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[88]  D. Vanham,et al.  The water footprint of different diets within European sub-national geographical entities , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[89]  N. Fukagawa,et al.  Integrated data across multiple and diverse disciplines are essential for developing a sustainable food system , 2019, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[90]  Division on Earth,et al.  Science Breakthroughs to Advance Food and Agricultural Research by 2030 , 2019 .