MR measurement and numerical simulation of steady flow in an end-to-side anastomosis model.

Magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity imaging ('MR PC velocimetry') is a powerful tool for measuring blood velocity. While it has been demonstrated that MR PC velocimetry can accurately measure velocity profiles in simple, unidirectional flows, errors can arise when measuring the more complex, multidirectional flows of clinical importance. In this work, we have compared MR PC velocity measurements with numerical simulations of steady flow in a physiologically relevant model of an end-to-side anastomosis, which produces many of the complex flow features expected in vivo. MR PC velocity profiles, measured using both 2D and 3D pulse sequences, showed very good agreement with numerically computed profiles, although at 2D PC data showed slightly larger errors than the 3D PC data in regions of high accelerations and oblique flow, likely due to displacement artifacts. We conclude that, under ideal conditions, MR phase contrast velocimetry can measure complex flow patterns to within 15% accuracy, but that care should be taken when using 2D pulse sequences to measure such complex flows.

[1]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Stenosed anthropomorphic vascular phantoms for digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance, and Doppler ultrasound investigations , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[2]  C. Dumoulin,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[3]  B. Rubin,et al.  Candida infection with aneurysm formation in the juxtarenal aorta. , 1994, Journal of Vascular Surgery.

[4]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Steady and pulsatile flow fields in an end-to-side arterial anastomosis model. , 1990, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  D G Nishimura,et al.  On the nature and reduction of the displacement artifact in flow images , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  F. White Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[7]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity measurements for unsteady flow , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  D. Hearshen,et al.  Comparison of velocity‐encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  B. Rutt,et al.  Understanding acceleration‐induced displacement artifacts in phase‐contrast MR velocity measurements , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  H Engels,et al.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance velocimetry for steady flow. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Andrew Bush,et al.  McDonald's blood flow in arteries, 3rd ed.: W.W. Nichols and M.F. O'Rourke Edward Arnold, Sevenoaks, Kent, 1990; 456 pp.; £75; ISBN 0-7131-5436-6 , 1991 .

[12]  W. Nichols McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries , 1996 .

[13]  D. Firmin,et al.  Measurement of Flow with NMR Imaging Using a Gradient Pulse and Phase Difference Technique , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.