Biomass harvesting and collection

Abstract With the development of bioenergy a substantial increase in biomass demand directly caused challenges to biomass harvesting. This chapter introduces the harvesting system for woody biomass, corn stover, sugarcane, and energy grasses. Woody biomass and roundwood are normally harvested using conventional one-pass or two-stage timber harvesting systems, while small-scale timber harvesting systems are becoming more attractive. As a predominant source of biomass, corn stover is often collected with conventional multipass forage harvest systems. Meanwhile agricultural machinery manufacturers are developing the single-pass combined stream harvesting system, which has been proposed as a viable harvest strategy for corn. For sugarcane harvesting, manual cutting with open-burning is not preferred, while green cane harvesting using whole stalk or chopper harvesters have become more favorable. In addition, harvesting of energy crops such as Giant Miscanthus, switchgrass, reed canary grass, and some other grasses can be done with conventional hay harvesting equipment. From the point of view of machinery, integration often provides more benefits to the cost reduction but fewer impacts on the environment; the application of new technologies in precision agriculture will subsequently improve the efficiency and the economy. Intensive biomass harvesting affects the ecosystem in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, soil quality, hydrology, and biodiversity. Life cycle assessment is an emerging tool to comprehensively analyze environmental impacts of harvesting activities, and its results could provide guidance to policy makers and scientists. Furthermore, biomass harvesting best management practices should be established based on science and then applied widely to reduce harmful effects due to biomass removal. Economically, governments should provide sufficient incentives to ensure growers’ incomes and the development of bioenergy.

[1]  Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira,et al.  Impact of mechanization and previous burning reduction on GHG emissions of sugarcane harvesting operations in Brazil , 2013 .

[2]  T. Brown,et al.  Effect of management on water quality in North American forests , 1994 .

[3]  Charles R. Blinn,et al.  Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: An overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002) , 2004 .

[4]  J. C. Smithers,et al.  Review of sugarcane trash recovery systems for energy cogeneration in South Africa , 2014 .

[5]  Juan Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of Corn Harvest Strategies for Bioethanol Production , 2013 .

[6]  J. Bölscher,et al.  Impact of short-rotation coppice on water and land resources , 2014 .

[7]  Maria K. Janowiak,et al.  Promoting Ecological Sustainability in Woody Biomass Harvesting , 2010, Journal of Forestry.

[8]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Robert B. Rummer,et al.  Application of Small-Scale Systems: Evaluation of Alternatives , 1999 .

[10]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[11]  Adam E. Ahmed,et al.  An assessment of mechanical vs manual harvesting of the sugarcane in Sudan – The case of Sennar Sugar Factory , 2015 .

[12]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois , 2004 .

[13]  Dennis W. Hazel,et al.  Biomass Harvesting Guidelines affect downed woody debris retention , 2014 .

[14]  P. Ciais,et al.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks , 2008, Nature.

[15]  Kevin J. Shinners,et al.  Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage , 2007 .

[16]  Fengli Zhang,et al.  Life-cycle energy and GHG emissions of forest biomass harvest and transport for biofuel production in Michigan , 2015 .

[17]  Noriszura Ismail,et al.  Own damage, third party property damage claims and Malaysian motor insurance: An empirical examination , 2011 .

[18]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[19]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry , 2011 .

[20]  Stuart J. Birrell,et al.  Corn Stover Harvest Strategy Effects on Grain Yield and Soil Quality Indicators , 2012 .

[21]  Elio Santacesaria What Future for the Renewable Energy , 2015 .

[22]  H. W. Elbersen Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) as an alternative energy crop in Europe Initiation of a productivity network , 2001 .

[23]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Alternate biomass harvesting systems using conventional equipment , 1985 .

[24]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Sugarcane Harvesting System: a Critical Overview , 2013 .

[25]  Wallace E. Tyner,et al.  Corn stover for bioenergy production: cost estimates and farmer supply response. , 2014 .

[26]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  Gene E. Likens Biogeochemistry: Some Opportunities and Challenges for the Future , 2004 .

[28]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[29]  Ajit K. Srivastava,et al.  Environmental impacts of roundwood supply chain options in Michigan: life-cycle assessment of harvest and transport stages , 2014 .

[30]  H. Tiessen,et al.  Residue Management Effects on Sugarcane Yield and Soil Properties in Northeastern Brazil , 1993 .

[31]  R. Miller,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE AS PROVIDED BY FIELD TRIALS , 1994 .

[32]  Houfang Lu,et al.  A sustainable woody biomass biorefinery. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[33]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[34]  Faculty Member,et al.  Forecast Model of Sugar Loss Due to Mechanical Harvesting of the sugarcane crop , 2011 .

[35]  Liz Marshall,et al.  Corn Stover for Ethanol Production: Potential and Pitfalls , 2009 .

[36]  J. R. Hess,et al.  A five-year assessment of corn stover harvest in central Iowa, USA , 2011 .

[37]  A. Wood Management of crop residues following green harvesting of sugarcane in north Queensland , 1991 .

[38]  Tomas Gullberg,et al.  Transport and handling of forest energy bundles—advantages and problems , 2006 .

[39]  Francisco J. Arriaga,et al.  Vertical distribution of corn biomass as influenced by cover crop and stover harvest. , 2015 .

[40]  Raj Khosla,et al.  Precision agriculture: challenges and opportunities in a flat world , 2010 .

[41]  Henrique Coutinho Junqueira Franco,et al.  Contribution of nitrogen from sugarcane harvest residues and urea for crop nutrition , 2013 .

[42]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[43]  Bruce E. Dale,et al.  Corn Harvest Strategies for Combined Starch and Cellulosic Bioprocessing to Ethanol , 2011 .

[44]  Fugui Wang,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of a modified CENTURY model for simulating impacts of harvesting fine woody biomass for bioenergy. , 2013 .

[45]  Paul W. Gallagher,et al.  Biomass Supply From Corn Residues: Estimates and Critical Review of Procedures , 2012 .

[46]  Claus G. Sørensen,et al.  An environmental life cycle assessment of controlled traffic farming , 2014 .

[47]  Savitri Garivait,et al.  Effect of Open Burning on Soil Carbon Stock in Sugarcane Plantation in Thailand , 2013 .

[48]  Cole R. Gustafson,et al.  Economic Impact of Harvesting Corn Stover under Time Constraint: The Case of North Dakota , 2013 .