Need-Based Up-Regulation of Protein Levels in Response to Deletion of Their Duplicate Genes

Many duplicate genes maintain functional overlap despite divergence over long evolutionary time scales. Deleting one member of a paralogous pair often has no phenotypic effect, unless its paralog is also deleted. It has been suggested that this functional compensation might be mediated by active up-regulation of expression of a gene in response to deletion of its paralog. However, it is not clear how prevalent such paralog responsiveness is, nor whether it is hardwired or dependent on feedback from environmental conditions. Here, we address these questions at the genomic scale using high-throughput flow cytometry of single-cell protein levels in differentially labeled cocultures of wild-type and paralog-knockout Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. We find that only a modest fraction of proteins (22 out of 202) show significant up-regulation to deletion of their duplicate genes. However, these paralog-responsive proteins match almost exclusively duplicate pairs whose overlapping function is required for growth. Moreover, media conditions that add or remove requirements for the function of a duplicate gene pair specifically eliminate or create paralog responsiveness. Together, our results suggest that paralog responsiveness in yeast is need-based: it appears only in conditions in which the gene function is required. Physiologically, such need-based responsiveness could provide an adaptive mechanism for compensation of genetic, environmental, or stochastic perturbations in protein abundance.

[1]  P. Herrero,et al.  The hexokinase 2 protein regulates the expression of the GLK1, HXK1 and HXK2 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  Transcriptional Reprogramming and Backup Between Duplicate Genes: Is It a Genomewide Phenomenon? , 2006, Genetics.

[3]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  The Glycolytic Flux in Escherichia coli Is Controlled by the Demand for ATP , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  Ran Kafri,et al.  Genetic Redundancy: New Tricks for Old Genes , 2009, Cell.

[5]  A. Wagner Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Transcription control reprogramming in genetic backup circuits , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Ser3p (Yer081wp) and Ser33p (Yil074cp) Are Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae * , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Pilar Herrero,et al.  The Glucose-regulated Nuclear Localization of Hexokinase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Mig1-dependent* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Kenneth H Wolfe,et al.  Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast , 2007, Molecular Systems Biology.

[10]  A. DeLuna,et al.  Specialization of the paralogue LYS21 determines lysine biosynthesis under respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, Microbiology.

[11]  Daniel Segrè,et al.  The regulatory software of cellular metabolism. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  Dr. Susumu Ohno Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  S. Oliver,et al.  Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Hongyue Dai,et al.  Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Kenneth H. Wolfe,et al.  Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Dmitri A. Petrov,et al.  Pervasive and Persistent Redundancy among Duplicated Genes in Yeast , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[17]  P. Philippsen,et al.  The Ashbya gossypii Genome as a Tool for Mapping the Ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome , 2004, Science.

[18]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Atlas of the Physical Interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[19]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Network Features of the Mammalian Circadian Clock , 2009, PLoS biology.

[20]  J. Strathern,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics : a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual , 2005 .

[21]  Yoav Arava,et al.  Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels. , 2008, RNA.

[22]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[23]  A. Tong,et al.  Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  Ran Kafri,et al.  The regulatory utilization of genetic redundancy through responsive backup circuits. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Charles E. Chapple,et al.  Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype , 2004, Nature.

[26]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Kalin H. Vetsigian,et al.  Exposing the fitness contribution of duplicated genes , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Yuanfang Guan,et al.  Functional Analysis of Gene Duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Genetics.

[29]  U. Sauer,et al.  Metabolic functions of duplicate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Genome research.

[30]  D. G. Brown,et al.  The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. , 2000, Science.

[31]  M. Schartl,et al.  Regulatory back-up circuit of medaka Wt1 co-orthologs ensures PGC maintenance. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[32]  Gene Duplications: The Gradual Evolution of Functional Divergence , 2003, Current Biology.

[33]  N. Friedman,et al.  Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi , 2007, Nature.

[34]  John Postlethwait,et al.  Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  Jan Ihmels,et al.  Principles of transcriptional control in the metabolic network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  U. Sauer,et al.  Escherichia coli† , 2004 .

[37]  C. Pál,et al.  Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast , 2004, Nature.

[38]  Ran Kafri,et al.  Preferential protection of protein interaction network hubs in yeast: Evolved functionality of genetic redundancy , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  J. Pronk Auxotrophic Yeast Strains in Fundamental and Applied Research , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[40]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[41]  R. Guigó,et al.  Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia , 2006, Nature.

[42]  Nevan J Krogan,et al.  Backup without redundancy: genetic interactions reveal the cost of duplicate gene loss , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[43]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[44]  Steven Maere,et al.  Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  Jianzhi Zhang Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[46]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  The Yeast Glycerol 3-Phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p Are Required for Glycerol Biosynthesis and Differentially Involved in the Cellular Responses to Osmotic, Anaerobic, and Oxidative Stress* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome , 1997, Nature.

[48]  S. Shvartsman,et al.  Cad74A is regulated by BR and is required for robust dorsal appendage formation in Drosophila oogenesis. , 2008, Developmental biology.

[49]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Reproductive toxicology. Chemical mixture. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[50]  Jeroen Raes,et al.  Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[51]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[52]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[53]  A. DeLuna,et al.  Specialization of the paralogue LYS 21 determines lysine biosynthesis under respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008 .

[54]  B. Daignan-Fornier,et al.  Cloning of the ASN1 and ASN2 genes encoding asparagine synthetases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: differential regulation by the CCAAT‐box‐binding factor , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[55]  D. Vitkup,et al.  Influence of metabolic network structure and function on enzyme evolution , 2006, Genome Biology.

[56]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations , 2003, Nature.

[57]  A. Wagner Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[58]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[59]  Kevin P. Byrne,et al.  Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts , 2006, Nature.

[60]  A. Wagner,et al.  Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes. , 2003, Genome research.

[61]  Guillaume Blanc,et al.  Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[62]  L-Asparagine auxotrophs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: genetic and phenotypic characterization , 1978, Journal of bacteriology.

[63]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of genetic redundancy , 1997, Nature.

[64]  J. Brookfield Genetic redundancy: Screening for selection in yeast , 1997, Current Biology.

[65]  B. Bassler,et al.  Gene dosage compensation calibrates four regulatory RNAs to control Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[66]  R. V. Prasad,et al.  A strategy for increasing an in vivo flux by genetic manipulations. The tryptophan system of yeast. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[67]  J M Thevelein,et al.  The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD+‐dependent glycerol 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[68]  Zhaolei Zhang,et al.  The extensive and condition-dependent nature of epistasis among whole-genome duplicates in yeast. , 2008, Genome research.

[69]  S. Oliver Metabolism: Demand management in cells , 2002, Nature.