Recently, studies have found majority status, gender and age are related to prejudice towards sexual minorities, yet very few studies have provided separate analysis of the individuals within the monolithic LGBT acronym. To date, studies have shown religiosity, political orientation, belief about the origin of homosexuality and attitudes towards science are correlated to biases towards LGBT identities, but less have examined interaction effects between those covariates. Here, we conduct a study to investigate differences in Christian attitudes towards the separate individuals within the LGBT acronym by gender and age as well as the underlying schemas that are attributed to that prejudice. Christian participants provided demographic information and measures of political orientation, religiosity, attitudes towards science and belief about the etiology of homosexuality then gave their attitudes towards LGBT individuals. Average total prejudice was significantly greater (p < 0.001) for heterosexual male participant’s (N=123, Mage = 34) than heterosexual female participants (N=41, Mage = 24). Generation Z participants (N=71, Mage = 20.83) displayed significantly lower (p <0.004) prejudice than Generation Y participants (N=80, Mage = 32.11). Additionally, OLS regressions support previous research that Christian attitudes towards LGBT individuals significantly relate to conservative political beliefs (p < 0.001, R = 0.34), high religiosity (p < 0.001, R = 0.26), belief about the origin of homosexuality (p < 0.01, R = 0.43) and negative attitudes towards science (p < 0.001, R = 0.5). Further, the interaction effects of these covariates show differences and similarities for attitudes towards homosexual, bisexual, and trans-individuals. This study demonstrates that attitudes towards LGBT identities are more nuanced than previously reported and that a separate analysis should be performed for the individuals within the subgroups of LGBT when investigating attitudes towards the LGBT community.
[1]
Thomas J. Billard.
Attitudes Toward Transgender Men and Women: Development and Validation of a New Measure
,
2018,
Front. Psychol..
[2]
D. Herbenick,et al.
Attitudes toward Bisexual Men and Women among a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Adults in the United States
,
2016,
PloS one.
[3]
C. E. Phillips.
Two reliability generalization studies: The Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA) and the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) Scale
,
2016
.
[4]
S. Rutledge,et al.
The Importance of Confirmatory Validation: Short Version of the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale
,
2014,
Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research.
[5]
Joseph O. Baker,et al.
Homosexuality, Religion, and Science: Moral Authority and the Persistence of Negative Attitudes†
,
2012
.
[6]
Brian A. Nosek,et al.
“Do Unto Others”: Effects of Priming the Golden Rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ Attitudes Toward Gay People
,
2010
.
[7]
C. Heyrman,et al.
Southern Cross: The Beginnings of the Bible Belt.
,
2000
.
[8]
T. Jelen,et al.
Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: A Methodological Investigation
,
1990
.