Knowledge Specialization in Ph.D. Student Groups

Researchers have argued that specialization within groups yields productivity gains. We evaluate this statement with a focus on groups of Ph.D. students. Using an established technique in computer science called Latent Dirichlet Allocation, we construct a novel measure of the dispersion of Ph.D. students' research interests based on their dissertation abstracts. We then relate this measure to Ph.D. group publications. For our study, we use a rich dataset on groups of Ph.D. students who studied at a major Swiss University, during the 1993-2008 period. We find robust evidence that within-group knowledge specialization is associated with a larger number of publications. However, when specialization increases beyond a critical level, it hinders the group's publication output. We interpret these results as an indication that gains, in the amount of research output, can be achieved if Ph.D. students specialize according to their comparative advantages. However, beyond a certain level, knowledge specialization has a detrimental impact on research output, due to increasing communication costs and an increased likelihood of conflict insurgence.

[1]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research in Economics , 1997 .

[2]  Terry Shinn,et al.  Hiérarchies des chercheurs et formes des recherches , 1988 .

[3]  Dirk P. Libaers,et al.  Time Allocation Decisions of Academic Scientists and Their Impact on Technology Commercialization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Probabilistic Topic Models , 2007 .

[5]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[6]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[7]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus , 1999 .

[8]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[10]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Knowledge Production Function for University Patenting , 2010 .

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  To The Raider Goes The Surplus? A Reexaminationof the Free‐Rider Problem , 1992 .

[13]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Impact of Nsf Support for Basic Research in Economic , 1998 .

[14]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Personnel Economics for Managers , 1997 .

[15]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models , 2010, ICWSM.

[16]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[18]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[19]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[20]  M. Amin,et al.  Impact factors: use and abuse. , 2003, Medicina.

[21]  Paula E. Stephan How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[22]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  The Unequal Benefits of Academic Patenting for Science and Engineering Research , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  Martin F. Porter,et al.  An algorithm for suffix stripping , 1997, Program.

[24]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives, and Local Development Objectives , 2009, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[25]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[26]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[27]  E. Lazear Globalisation and the Market for Team‐Mates , 1999 .

[28]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Economics of University Lab Science and the Role of Foreign Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars , 2008 .

[29]  G. Steven McMillan,et al.  The impact of publicly funded basic research: an integrative extension of Martin and Salter , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[30]  Shimei Pan,et al.  Topic and keyword re-ranking for LDA-based topic modeling , 2009, CIKM.

[31]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation , 2006 .

[32]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[33]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[34]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[35]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Individual effects and dynamics in count data models , 2002 .

[36]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[37]  S. Stewman Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[38]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 1979, Scientometrics.

[40]  Dirk P. Libaers,et al.  Role and Contribution of Foreign-Born Scientists and Engineers to the Public U.S. Nanoscience and Technology Research Enterprise , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  Fabian Waldinger,et al.  Quality Matters: The Expulsion of Professors and the Consequences for PhD Student Outcomes in Nazi Germany , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[42]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[43]  Lars Lefgren,et al.  What Do Parents Value in Education? An Empirical Investigation of Parents' Revealed Preferences for Teachers , 2007 .

[44]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  From Wires to Partners: How the Internet Has Fostered R&D Collaborations within Firms , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[46]  PhD Attainment of Graduates of Selective Private Academic Institutions , 2007, Education Finance and Policy.

[47]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  The two faces of PhD students: Management of early careers of French PhDs in life sciences , 2003 .

[48]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[49]  Andrea Vezzulli,et al.  If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world , 2007 .