The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ridding,et al. Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous theta-burst stimulation , 2015, Neuroscience.
[2] Ulrich Dirnagl,et al. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility , 2015, Nature.
[3] R. Kaplan,et al. Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time , 2015, PloS one.
[4] R. Lanfear,et al. Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording , 2015, PLoS biology.
[5] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Promoting an open research culture , 2015, Science.
[6] Stephen E. Fienberg,et al. Self-correction in science at work , 2015, Science.
[7] B. Hemmelgarn,et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[8] W. Anderson. Stamp out shabby research conduct , 2015, Nature.
[9] R. Lanfear,et al. The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science , 2015, PLoS biology.
[10] L. Halsey,et al. The fickle P value generates irreproducible results , 2015, Nature Methods.
[11] S. Rossi,et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[12] J. Rothwell,et al. Corticospinal activity evoked and modulated by non‐invasive stimulation of the intact human motor cortex , 2014, The Journal of physiology.
[13] Neil Malhotra,et al. Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer , 2014, Science.
[14] M. Ridding,et al. Non-invasive induction of plasticity in the human cortex: Uses and limitations , 2014, Cortex.
[15] J. Mervis. Research Transparency. Why null results rarely see the light of day. , 2014, Science.
[16] B. Cheeran,et al. Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.
[17] Regina Nuzzo,et al. Scientific method: Statistical errors , 2014, Nature.
[18] C. Gamble,et al. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review , 2013, PloS one.
[19] J. Rothwell,et al. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[20] Leif D. Nelson,et al. P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[21] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[22] Rex B. Kline,et al. Beyond Significance Testing: Statistics Reform in the Behavioral Sciences , 2013 .
[23] J. Wicherts,et al. The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[24] H. Beek. F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. , 2012 .
[25] C. Ferguson,et al. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. , 2012, Psychological methods.
[26] G. Loewenstein,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.
[27] E. Wagenmakers,et al. Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[28] J. Schooler. Unpublished results hide the decline effect , 2011, Nature.
[29] Á. Pascual-Leone,et al. Safety of Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2011, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.
[30] M. Ridding,et al. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects , 2010, The Journal of physiology.
[31] H. Kölsch,et al. Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review , 2010, Trials.
[32] J. Ioannidis. Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated , 2008, Epidemiology.
[33] J. Ioannidis,et al. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias , 2008, PloS one.
[34] J. Rothwell,et al. Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.
[35] I. Cuthill,et al. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[36] Michael C. Ridding,et al. Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.
[37] S. C. Gandevia,et al. Theta burst stimulation does not reliably depress all regions of the human motor cortex , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[38] J. Ioannidis,et al. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[39] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. Scientists behaving badly , 2005, Nature.
[40] J. Rothwell,et al. Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.
[41] Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al. Pixels or pencils? The relative effectiveness of Web-based versus paper surveys , 2004 .
[42] L. Cohen,et al. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[43] B L Day,et al. Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[44] A. Barker,et al. NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.
[45] R. Rosenthal. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .
[46] T. Sterling. Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa , 1959 .
[47] Jan Lundqvist. Why and How , 1947 .