Life cycle assessment of emerging environmental technologies in the early stage of development: A case study on nanostructured materials

The use of nanostructured materials has been recently proposed in the field of environmental nanoremediation. This approach consists in using nanomaterials not directly, but as building blocks for the design of nano‐porous micro‐dimensional systems, overcoming the eco‐ and health‐toxicology risks generally associated with the use of nano‐sized technologies. Herein we report the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as an eco‐design tool for optimizing the production of cellulose nanosponges (CNS), nanostructured materials recently developed for water remediation purposes. LCA was applied from the acquisition of raw materials to the synthesis of CNS (from cradle‐to‐gate), considering three production systems, from the lab‐level to a modeled scale‐up system. The lab‐scale LCA identified the main environmental hotspots, namely the energy‐consuming steps and the final purification of the material (washing step). In a second lab‐scale production, an improvement action could be implemented, switching the washing solvent from methanol to water and decreasing the washing temperature. A second LCA showed a reduced contribution to the impacts from the materials, while the global impacts remained within the same order of magnitude. A simulated scale‐up of the process allowed to optimize the energy‐consuming steps and the water consumption, through internal recycling. A third LCA assessed the resulting benefits and a decrease in the global impacts by two orders of magnitude. Our study contributes to the discussion of LCA community, providing a focus on the importance of scaling‐up of emerging technologies, namely nanostructured porous materials, highlighting the benefits of a LCA based approach since the very beginning of product design (eco‐design).

[1]  Witold-Roger Poganietz,et al.  Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[2]  P. Michaud,et al.  TEMPO-mediated oxidation of polysaccharides: An ongoing story. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.

[3]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) in municipal solid waste management: A comparative study on street sweeping services , 2018 .

[4]  A. Mele,et al.  TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Cross-Linked with Branched Polyethyleneimine: Nanostructured Adsorbent Sponges for Water Remediation. , 2015, ChemPlusChem.

[5]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals? , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[6]  Mirko Miseljic,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: a literature review of assessment status , 2014, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[7]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  T. Daddi,et al.  Environmentally Sustainable and Ecosafe Polysaccharide-Based Materials for Water Nano-Treatment: An Eco-Design Study , 2018, Materials.

[9]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[10]  Barbara Karn,et al.  The Road to Green Nanotechnology , 2008 .

[11]  G. Turco,et al.  Mechanical and Drug Release Properties of Sponges from Cross-linked Cellulose Nanofibers. , 2017, ChemPlusChem.

[12]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Freshwater ecotoxicity characterisation factor for metal oxide nanoparticles: a case study on titanium dioxide nanoparticle. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Environmental assessment of future technologies: how to trim LCA to fit this goal? , 2009 .

[15]  Paolo Masoni,et al.  Combining life cycle assessment and qualitative risk assessment: the case study of alumina nanofluid production. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: state of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  P. Anastas,et al.  Toward Green Nano , 2008 .

[18]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Ex-ante LCA of Emerging Technologies , 2018 .

[19]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Prospective Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Nanosilver T-Shirts , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Fabio Iraldo,et al.  Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs , 2017 .

[21]  European Parliament Resolution on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: An Action Plan for Europe 2005–2009 , 2010 .

[22]  Leanne M. Gilbertson,et al.  Research highlights: applications of life-cycle assessment as a tool for characterizing environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials , 2017 .

[23]  Roland Hischier,et al.  Framework for LCI modelling of releases of manufactured nanomaterials along their life cycle , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  G Libralato,et al.  Ecofriendly nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for environmental applications: Key issue and consensus recommendations for sustainable and ecosafe nanoremediation. , 2018, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[25]  Akira Isogai,et al.  TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[26]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials , 2008 .

[27]  Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg,et al.  Combining ex-ante LCA and EHS screening to assist green design: A case study of cellulose nanocrystal foam , 2018 .

[28]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies , 2016 .

[29]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Life Cycle Energy and Climate Change Implications of Nanotechnologies , 2013 .

[30]  Rajive Dhingra,et al.  Sustainable Nanotechnology: Through Green Methods and Life-Cycle Thinking , 2010 .

[31]  Thomas L. Theis,et al.  Toward Sustainable Nanoproducts , 2008 .

[32]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Life cycle assessment at nanoscale: review and recommendations , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[33]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Identification of Risks in the Life Cycle of Nanotechnology‐Based Products , 2008 .

[34]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Life Cycle of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Production , 2011 .