Serine and Threonine Residues Bend α-Helices in the χ1 = g− Conformation

The relationship between the Ser, Thr, and Cys side-chain conformation (chi(1) = g(-), t, g(+)) and the main-chain conformation (phi and psi angles) has been studied in a selection of protein structures that contain alpha-helices. The statistical results show that the g(-) conformation of both Ser and Thr residues decreases their phi angles and increases their psi angles relative to Ala, used as a control. The additional hydrogen bond formed between the O(gamma) atom of Ser and Thr and the i-3 or i-4 peptide carbonyl oxygen induces or stabilizes a bending angle in the helix 3-4 degrees larger than for Ala. This is of particular significance for membrane proteins. Incorporation of this small bending angle in the transmembrane alpha-helix at one side of the cell membrane results in a significant displacement of the residues located at the other side of the membrane. We hypothesize that local alterations of the rotamer configurations of these Ser and Thr residues may result in significant conformational changes across transmembrane helices, and thus participate in the molecular mechanisms underlying transmembrane signaling. This finding has provided the structural basis to understand the experimentally observed influence of Ser residues on the conformational equilibrium between inactive and active states of the receptor, in the neurotransmitter subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors.

[1]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Arrangement of rhodopsin transmembrane α-helices , 1997, Nature.

[2]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[3]  H Weinstein,et al.  Agonists induce conformational changes in transmembrane domains III and VI of the β2 adrenoceptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[4]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  B. Matthews,et al.  Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within alpha-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Brian K. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Instability of a Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  R Henderson,et al.  Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  D C Rees,et al.  Light-induced structural changes in photosynthetic reaction center: implications for mechanism of electron-proton transfer. , 1997, Science.

[9]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[11]  Nivedita Borkakoti,et al.  Solvent-induced distortions and the curvature of α-helices , 1983, Nature.

[12]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[13]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Constitutive activity of receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins. , 1993, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[14]  B. Kobilka,et al.  G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Kenneth A Jacobson,et al.  Molecular architecture of G protein‐coupled receptors , 1996, Drug development research.

[16]  T. Kenakin,et al.  Physiological effects of inverse agonists in transgenic mice with myocardial overexpression of the β2-adrenoceptor , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Kuo-Chen Chou,et al.  Energetic approach to the packing of α-helices. II: General treatment of nonequivalent and nonregular helices , 1984 .

[18]  L. Pardo,et al.  The effect of the molecular mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor activation on the process of signal transduction. , 1997, European journal of pharmacology.

[19]  P. Molinari,et al.  Catechol-binding serines of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors control the equilibrium between active and inactive receptor states. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[20]  B. Chait,et al.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. , 1998, Science.

[21]  T. Tomizaki,et al.  The Whole Structure of the 13-Subunit Oxidized Cytochrome c Oxidase at 2.8 Å , 1996, Science.

[22]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with beta-branched residues at neighboring positions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Baldwin,et al.  An alpha-carbon template for the transmembrane helices in the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  G von Heijne,et al.  A turn propensity scale for transmembrane helices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A mutation-induced activated state of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Extending the ternary complex model. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.