Large-Scale Coding Sequence Change Underlies the Evolution of Postdevelopmental Novelty in Honey Bees.

Whether coding or regulatory sequence change is more important to the evolution of phenotypic novelty is one of biology’s major unresolved questions. The field of evo–devo has shown that in early development changes to regulatory regions are the dominant mode of genetic change, but whether this extends to the evolution of novel phenotypes in the adult organism is unclear. Here, we conduct ten RNA-Seq experiments across both novel and conserved tissues in the honey bee to determine to what extent postdevelopmental novelty is based on changes to the coding regions of genes. We make several discoveries. First, we show that with respect to novel physiological functions in the adult animal, positively selected tissue-specific genes of high expression underlie novelty by conferring specialized cellular functions. Such genes are often, but not always taxonomically restricted genes (TRGs). We further show that positively selected genes, whether TRGs or conserved genes, are the least connected genes within gene expression networks. Overall, this work suggests that the evo–devo paradigm is limited, and that the evolution of novelty, postdevelopment, follows additional rules. Specifically, evo–devo stresses that high network connectedness (repeated use of the same gene in many contexts) constrains coding sequence change as it would lead to negative pleiotropic effects. Here, we show that in the adult animal, the converse is true: Genes with low network connectedness (TRGs and tissue-specific conserved genes) underlie novel phenotypes by rapidly changing coding sequence to perform new-specialized functions.

[1]  A. Elofsson,et al.  Orphans and new gene origination, a structural and evolutionary perspective. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  O. Shafer,et al.  The Drosophila Circadian Clock Is a Variably Coupled Network of Multiple Peptidergic Units , 2014, Science.

[3]  Li Zhao,et al.  Origin and Spread of de Novo Genes in Drosophila melanogaster Populations , 2014, Science.

[4]  C. Kent,et al.  Population genomics of the honey bee reveals strong signatures of positive selection on worker traits , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Dan Graur,et al.  Finding the missing honey bee genes: lessons learned from a genome upgrade , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[6]  S. Sumner The importance of genomic novelty in social evolution , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[7]  David J. Adams,et al.  Contributions of Protein-Coding and Regulatory Change to Adaptive Molecular Evolution in Murid Rodents , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[8]  A. Gardiner,et al.  The evolution of novelty in conserved genes; evidence of positive selection in the Drosophila fruitless gene is localised to alternatively spliced exons , 2013, Heredity.

[9]  Josephine A. Reinhardt,et al.  De Novo ORFs in Drosophila Are Important to Organismal Fitness and Evolved Rapidly from Previously Non-coding Sequences , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[10]  M. Long,et al.  New genes as drivers of phenotypic evolution , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  D. Tautz,et al.  Phylogenetic patterns of emergence of new genes support a model of frequent de novo evolution , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[12]  E. Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  Mechanisms and Dynamics of Orphan Gene Emergence in Insect Genomes , 2013, Genome biology and evolution.

[13]  W. Leal,et al.  Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. , 2013, Annual review of entomology.

[14]  David L. Stern,et al.  Aphids evolved novel secreted proteins for symbiosis with bacterial endosymbiont , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Understanding the relationship between brain gene expression and social behavior: lessons from the honey bee. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[16]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Origins of New Genes and Evolution of Their Novel Functions , 2012 .

[17]  F. Kondrashov Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Parsch,et al.  Newly evolved genes: Moving from comparative genomics to functional studies in model systems , 2012, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[19]  D. Tautz,et al.  The evolutionary origin of orphan genes , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  Brielle J. Fischman,et al.  Genes involved in convergent evolution of eusociality in bees , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Brian R Johnson,et al.  Taxonomically restricted genes are associated with the evolution of sociality in the honey bee , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[22]  C. Jiggins,et al.  A golden age for evolutionary genetics? Genomic studies of adaptation in natural populations. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  T. Schöneberg,et al.  Monogamy evolves through multiple mechanisms: evidence from V1aR in deer mice. , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  Brian R Johnson,et al.  Deconstructing the Superorganism: Social Physiology, Groundplans, and Sociogenomics , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  K. Zhu‐Salzman,et al.  Effect of primer pheromones and pollen diet on the food producing glands of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). , 2010, Journal of insect physiology.

[26]  Brian R. Johnson,et al.  Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  T. Bosch,et al.  More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  H. Takeuchi,et al.  Differential Gene Expression in the Hypopharyngeal Glands of Worker Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) Associated with an Age-Dependent Role Change , 2009, Zoological science.

[29]  Z. Huang,et al.  Regulation of hypopharyngeal gland activity and oogenesis in honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[30]  Steve Horvath,et al.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  L. Armengol,et al.  Origin of primate orphan genes: a comparative genomics approach. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[32]  Kenneth H. Wolfe,et al.  Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  David L Stern,et al.  The Loci of Evolution: How Predictable is Genetic Evolution? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  S. Carroll Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution , 2008, Cell.

[36]  J. V. Van Beeumen,et al.  Proteomic analysis of the honey bee worker venom gland focusing on the mechanisms of protection against tissue damage. , 2008, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[37]  Jason B. Williams,et al.  Age and natural metabolically-intensive behavior affect oxidative stress and antioxidant mechanisms , 2008, Experimental Gerontology.

[38]  Brian R. Johnson Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  G. Wagner,et al.  The road to modularity , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Melanie A. Huntley,et al.  Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny , 2007, Nature.

[41]  Mira V. Han,et al.  Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[42]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[44]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Central Projections of Sensory Systems Involved in Honey Bee Dance Language Communication , 2007, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[45]  J. Coyne,et al.  THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  Jun Wang,et al.  Identification and characterization of insect-specific proteins by genome data analysis , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[47]  D. Field,et al.  Large-Scale Comparative Genomic Ranking of Taxonomically Restricted Genes (TRGs) in Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes , 2007, PloS one.

[48]  R. Kucharski,et al.  Novel cuticular proteins revealed by the honey bee genome. , 2007, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[49]  Y. P. Chen,et al.  Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera , 2006, Insect molecular biology.

[50]  H. Hoekstra Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates , 2006, Heredity.

[51]  D. Field,et al.  Orphans as taxonomically restricted and ecologically important genes. , 2005, Microbiology.

[52]  G. Robinson,et al.  Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Generating phenotypic variation: prospects from “evo‐devo” research on Bicyclus anynana wing patterns , 2005, Evolution & development.

[54]  Mark J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  Jeroen Raes,et al.  Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[56]  R. Nocelli,et al.  Juvenile Hormone Effect on the Venom Gland Secretory Cycle in Workers of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae) , 2004 .

[57]  M. Lynch,et al.  The Origins of Genome Complexity , 2003, Science.

[58]  G. Robinson,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees , 2003, Science.

[59]  D. Tautz,et al.  An evolutionary analysis of orphan genes in Drosophila. , 2003, Genome research.

[60]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  The evolution of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[61]  Vladimir Brusic,et al.  Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny of Elapid Snake Venom Three-Finger Toxins , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[62]  Jianzhi Zhang Evolution by gene duplication: an update , 2003 .

[63]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  P. Brakefield,et al.  The genetics and evo–devo of butterfly wing patterns , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[65]  G. Robinson,et al.  Annotated expressed sequence tags and cDNA microarrays for studies of brain and behavior in the honey bee. , 2002, Genome research.

[66]  W. Arthur,et al.  The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology , 2002, Nature.

[67]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[68]  T. P. King,et al.  Structure and Biology of Stinging Insect Venom Allergens , 2000, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[69]  D. Stern,et al.  Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  P. Bulet,et al.  Antimicrobial peptides in insects; structure and function. , 1999, Developmental and comparative immunology.

[71]  J. Daltry,et al.  Diet and snake venom evolution , 1996, Nature.

[72]  M. D. Owen,et al.  Melittin synthesis in the venom system of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). , 1995, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[73]  S. Carroll Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates , 1995, Nature.

[74]  C. Carter,et al.  Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model , 1995, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[75]  S. O. Andersen,et al.  Insect cuticular proteins. , 1995, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[76]  C. Ferris,et al.  Patterns of brain vasopressin receptor distribution associated with social organization in microtine rodents , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[77]  W. Terra,et al.  Insect digestive enzymes: properties, compartmentalization and function , 1994 .

[78]  Thomas R. Insel,et al.  A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles , 1993, Nature.

[79]  K. Crailsheim Interadult feeding of jelly in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[80]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[81]  David Reznick,et al.  Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[82]  R. E. Page,et al.  The Genetics of Division of Labour in Honey Bee Colonies , 1991 .

[83]  Paul Schedl,et al.  The locus of , 1984 .

[84]  M. D. Owen,et al.  Aging in the venom glands of queen and worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): some morphological and chemical observations. , 1976, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.