Finally a Case for Collaborative VR?: The Need to Design for Remote Multi-Party Conversations

Amid current social distancing measures requiring people to work from home, there has been renewed interest on how to effectively converse and collaborate remotely utilizing currently available technologies. On the surface, VR provides a perfect platform for effective remote communication. It can transfer contextual and environmental cues and facilitate a shared perspective while also allowing people to be virtually co-located. Yet we argue that currently VR is not adequately designed for such a communicative purpose. In this paper, we outline three key barriers to using VR for conversational activity: (1) variability of social immersion, (2) unclear user roles, and (3) the need for effective shared visual reference. Based on this outline, key design topics are discussed through a user experience design perspective for considerations in a future collaborative design framework.

[1]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Effects of avatar and background representation forms to co-presence in mixed reality (MR) tele-conference systems , 2016, SIGGRAPH ASIA Virtual Reality meets Physical Reality.

[2]  Steve Benford,et al.  User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[3]  Dongsik Jo,et al.  Effects of Avatar and Background Types on Users’ Co-presence and Trust for Mixed Reality-Based Teleconference Systems , 2017 .

[4]  David J. Roberts,et al.  Collaborative virtual reality platform for visualizing space data and mission planning , 2019, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[5]  Anthony Scavarelli,et al.  Towards a Framework on Accessible and Social VR in Education , 2019, 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[6]  Richard C. Waters,et al.  Building Multiuser Interactive Multimedia Environments at MERL , 1995, IEEE Multim..

[7]  Oliver Otto,et al.  A review on effective closely-coupled collaboration using immersive CVE's , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[8]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Co-presence and proxemics in shared walkable virtual environments with mixed colocation , 2018, VRST.

[9]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Who, Me? How Virtual Agents Can Shape Conversational Footing in Virtual Reality , 2017, IVA.

[10]  Jesús Favela,et al.  Assessing empathy and managing emotions through interactions with an affective avatar , 2018, Health Informatics J..

[11]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Shaping Pro-Social Interaction in VR: An Emerging Design Framework , 2019, CHI.

[12]  Michael Neff,et al.  Communication Behavior in Embodied Virtual Reality , 2018, CHI.

[13]  Minh-Triet Tran,et al.  Applying Virtual Reality in City Planning , 2016, HCI.

[14]  Dieter Kranzlmüller,et al.  Supporting social human communication between distributed walk-in displays , 2004, VRST '04.

[15]  Nick V. Flor.  Side-by-side collaboration: a case study , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Jason Jerald,et al.  The VR Book: Human-Centered Design for Virtual Reality , 2015 .

[17]  Hui Huang.  SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Virtual Reality meets Physical Reality: Modelling and Simulating Virtual Humans and Environments , 2016, SIGGRAPH ASIA Virtual Reality meets Physical Reality.

[18]  Oliver Otto,et al.  A review of telecollaboration technologies with respect to closely coupled collaboration , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[19]  Marc Erich Latoschik,et al.  Beyond Replication: Augmenting Social Behaviors in Multi-User Virtual Realities , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[20]  Douglas Zytko,et al.  Towards a Taxonomy of Social VR Application Design , 2019, CHI PLAY.

[21]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work , 2000, CSCW '00.