Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.

An ongoing discussion about the role of age of acquisition (AoA) in word processing concerns the confound with word frequency. This study removed possible frequency confounds by comparing AoA and word familiarity differences in young (18-23 years) and older (52-56 years) adults. A first study investigated the differences in AoA and word familiarity ratings. The norms of AoA and familiarity were significantly different for young and older adults whereas these were previously considered equivalent [Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 435-459]. In the second study, AoA and familiarity effects were significantly different for the older and young adults in a lexical decision task. The third study replicated these findings in a semantic artifact/naturally occurring categorization experiment, thus providing further evidence for AoA-effects when word processing requires semantic mediation. Results from both studies were in line with the hypothesis that AoA effects on word processing cannot be accounted for by word frequency or other possible confounds.

[1]  Gerrit Storms,et al.  Prototype and Exemplar-Based Information in Natural Language Categories , 2000 .

[2]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[3]  G. Cottrell,et al.  Age of Acquisition in Connectionist Networks , 2001 .

[4]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[7]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Research on individual differences requires correlational analysis, not ANOVA , 1978 .

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[10]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[11]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance-based account? , 1999, Cognition.

[13]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2332 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories , 2003 .

[15]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Jacob Cohen.  The Cost of Dichotomization , 1983 .

[17]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[18]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Christopher Barry,et al.  The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? , 2004 .

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns , 2000 .

[21]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[23]  R. Rosenthal.  Critiquing Pygmalion: A 25-Year Perspective , 1995 .

[24]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[25]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[26]  Karsten Müller,et al.  Distinct brain representations for early and late learned words , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[28]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[29]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[30]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition , 1981 .

[31]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. , 1993 .

[32]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis , 2002 .

[33]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[34]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[35]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[36]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[37]  Geoffrey B. Duggan,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Ageing, and Verb Production: Normative and Experimental Data , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent , 2006 .