Deep residual networks for automatic segmentation of laparoscopic videos of the liver

Motivation: For primary and metastatic liver cancer patients undergoing liver resection, a laparoscopic approach can reduce recovery times and morbidity while offering equivalent curative results; however, only about 10% of tumours reside in anatomical locations that are currently accessible for laparoscopic resection. Augmenting laparoscopic video with registered vascular anatomical models from pre-procedure imaging could support using laparoscopy in a wider population. Segmentation of liver tissue on laparoscopic video supports the robust registration of anatomical liver models by filtering out false anatomical correspondences between pre-procedure and intra-procedure images. In this paper, we present a convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to liver segmentation in laparoscopic liver procedure videos. Method: We defined a CNN architecture comprising fully-convolutional deep residual networks with multi-resolution loss functions. The CNN was trained in a leave-one-patient-out cross-validation on 2050 video frames from 6 liver resections and 7 laparoscopic staging procedures, and evaluated using the Dice score. Results: The CNN yielded segmentations with Dice scores ≥0.95 for the majority of images; however, the inter-patient variability in median Dice score was substantial. Four failure modes were identified from low scoring segmentations: minimal visible liver tissue, inter-patient variability in liver appearance, automatic exposure correction, and pathological liver tissue that mimics non-liver tissue appearance. Conclusion: CNNs offer a feasible approach for accurately segmenting liver from other anatomy on laparoscopic video, but additional data or computational advances are necessary to address challenges due to the high inter-patient variability in liver appearance.

[1]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[2]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  The NifTK software platform for image-guided interventions: platform overview and NiftyLink messaging , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Dynamic view expansion for minimally invasive surgery using simultaneous localization and mapping , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  A. Meola,et al.  Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review , 2017, Neurosurgical Review.

[5]  G. Wakabayashi,et al.  Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Nazim Haouchine,et al.  Segmentation and labelling of intra-operative laparoscopic images using structure from point cloud , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[7]  Jian Sun,et al.  Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networks , 2016, ECCV.

[8]  Luca Bertinetto,et al.  Fully-Convolutional Siamese Networks for Object Tracking , 2016, ECCV Workshops.

[9]  F. Pruvot,et al.  An update on laparoscopic liver resection: The French Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery Association statement. , 2015, Journal of visceral surgery.

[10]  Kevin Cleary,et al.  Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Luca Bertinetto,et al.  Learning feed-forward one-shot learners , 2016, NIPS.

[12]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[13]  A. Tsung,et al.  Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. , 2011, Archives of surgery.

[14]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Accuracy validation of an image guided laparoscopy system for liver resection , 2015, Medical Imaging.