Study on the alternatives to reduce high-frequency noise from invasive recordings of atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation (CA) is nowadays the first-line therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This approach relies heavily on cardiac mapping systems, which provide intra-cardiac electrograms (EGMs) to study the heart's electrical activity. To get precise clinical information from these signals, the elimination of noise and nuisance interferences, as well as the preservation of their original waveform, are key aspects to treat carefully. However, how they should be preprocessed to remove successfully high-frequency noise has only received limited attention to date. Hence, in this study the most commonly bandpass filtering applied to this recording is compared with two advanced denoising methods, based on Wavelet Transform (WT) and Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), on a set of 150 synthesized bipolar EGMs with different levels of noise. The resulting signals have been contrasted with the original ones in terms of a signed correlation index (SCI), computed both from time and frequency domains. Thus, notably more significant alterations in the original waveform have been observed for the regular filtering than for the WT-based approach. As a conclusion, this method is a more interesting option than the regular filtering to preserve the morphology of the bipolar EGM and obtain more accurate electrophysiological information.

[1]  Douglas P. Zipes,et al.  Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 2012 .

[2]  Samuel J Asirvatham,et al.  Signals and signal processing for the electrophysiologist: part I: electrogram acquisition. , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[3]  Manuel Blanco-Velasco,et al.  ECG signal denoising and baseline wander correction based on the empirical mode decomposition , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[5]  Jie Lian,et al.  A simple method to quantify the morphological similarity between signals , 2010, Signal Process..

[6]  Jacques M T de Bakker,et al.  The Pathophysiologic Basis of Fractionated and Complex Electrograms and the Impact of Recording Techniques on Their Detection and Interpretation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[7]  Brij N. Singh,et al.  Optimal selection of wavelet basis function applied to ECG signal denoising , 2006, Digit. Signal Process..

[8]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Recording Techniques for Clinical Electrophysiology , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  Brian J Potter,et al.  Taking the pulse of atrial fibrillation , 2015, The Lancet.

[10]  Paul S Addison,et al.  Wavelet transforms and the ECG: a review , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[11]  U Schotten,et al.  Current controversies in determining the main mechanisms of atrial fibrillation , 2016, Journal of internal medicine.

[12]  Kang-Ming Chang Ensemble empirical mode decomposition for high frequency ECG noise reduction , 2010, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[13]  Olaf Dössel,et al.  Removing ventricular far-field signals in intracardiac electrograms during stable atrial tachycardia using the periodic component analysis. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[14]  Roberto Sassi,et al.  Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[16]  M. Zoni-Berisso,et al.  Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: European perspective , 2014, Clinical epidemiology.

[17]  S. Nattel,et al.  The value of basic research insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms as a guide to therapeutic innovation: a critical analysis. , 2016, Cardiovascular research.

[18]  H. Kiat,et al.  Electrocardiography: A Technologist’s Guide to Interpretation , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.