Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs

Designed learning environments embody conjectures about learning and instruction, and the empirical study of learning environments allows such conjectures to be refined over time. The construct of embodied conjecture is introduced as a way to demonstrate the theoretical nature of learning environment design and to frame methodological issues in studying such conjectures. An example of embodied conjecture and its history of empirical refinement are presented to provide a concrete example of how the effort to design instructional change can lead to a productive shift in view of the underlying learning issues at hand. This example is used to suggest some general features of embodied conjectures and to raise methodological issues for refining them.

[1]  S. Ralph Powers,et al.  National association for research in science teaching , 1931 .

[2]  L. Cronbach.  Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[3]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[4]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[5]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[6]  B. Rogoff.  Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[7]  Carol B. MacKnight,et al.  International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments , 1996, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[8]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Assessing the Nature of Science: What is the Nature of Our Assessments? , 1998 .

[9]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  What to do about educational research's credibility gaps? , 1999 .

[10]  Iris Tabak.  Unraveling the development of scientific literacy: Domain-specific inquiry support in a system of cognitive and social interactions , 1999 .

[11]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[12]  Corinne Zimmerman.  The development of scientific reasoning skills. , 2000 .

[13]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices , 2001 .

[14]  Iris Tabak,et al.  BGuILE: Stragtegic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms , 2001 .

[15]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Guest Editors' Introduction: Rethinking Methodology in the Learning Sciences , 2001 .

[16]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2002 .

[17]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[18]  Noel Enyedy,et al.  Knowledge Construction and Collective Practice: At the Intersection of Learning, Talk, and Social Configurations in a Computer-Mediated Mathematics Classroom , 2003 .

[19]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit , 2003 .

[20]  R. Sternberg.  What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[21]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[22]  D. C. Phillips,et al.  On the Science of Education Design Studies , 2003 .

[23]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[24]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[25]  W. Sandoval.  The inquiry paradox: why doing science doesn't necessarily change ideas about science , 2003 .

[26]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[27]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Ontological Innovation and the Role of Theory in Design Experiments , 2004 .

[28]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .