IS TASK AUTONOMY BENEFICIAL FOR CREATIVITY? PRIOR TASK EXPERIENCE AND SELF-CONTROL AS BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

In this study we elaborate on the autonomy–creativity relationship by identifying potential boundary conditions. Specifically, we hypothesized that when task autonomy is provided people’s reactions are shaped by the level of their prior experience or skills and by whether or not they have previously worked on a task autonomously. We further hypothesized that self-control would moderate the autonomy–creativity link. The analysis of data collected from 148 individuals who completed 2 sets of creativity tasks under different task conditions revealed that task autonomy reduces creative performance when there is no prior task-relevant experience. Individuals with high self-control showed similar levels of creativity regardless of the level of task autonomy. In contrast, those with low self-control performed more creatively under a no autonomy condition than under an autonomy condition. Our findings highlight the need for considering various boundary conditions when considering changes in the effects of task autonomy on creativity.

[1]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[2]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Time and Organizations , 1988 .

[3]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  G. Spreitzer PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[6]  M. Bazerman Judgement in Managerial Decision Making , 2003 .

[7]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Competition and Creative Performance: Effects of Competitor Presence and Visibility , 1997 .

[8]  J. Breaugh The Measurement of Work Autonomy , 1985 .

[9]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Self-regulation through goal setting , 1991 .

[10]  Jing Zhou Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. , 1998 .

[11]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative Development as Acquired Expertise: Theoretical Issues and an Empirical Test☆ , 2000 .

[12]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[13]  P. Tierney,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[14]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Creative Requirement , 2005 .

[15]  Paul W. Paese,et al.  Contrast Effects on Strategic-Issue Framing , 1996 .

[16]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Contextual Inhibitors of Employee Creativity in Organizations , 2009 .

[17]  Adam M. Grant The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[19]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[20]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[21]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Promised Reward and Creativity: Effects of Prior Experience , 1999 .

[22]  R. Baumeister,et al.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[23]  J. Plucker,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity , 1998 .

[24]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity , 1991 .

[25]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[26]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Incremental effects of reward on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  C. Carver,et al.  Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Film Awards as Indicators of Cinematic Creativity and Achievement: A Quantitative Comparison of the Oscars and Six Alternatives , 2004 .

[29]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  Work redesign and motivation , 1980 .

[30]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[31]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[32]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Creativity , 2007 .

[33]  Henry Moon ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY : DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS , 2004 .

[34]  Kyung Hee Kim,et al.  Is Creativity Unidimensional or Multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2006 .

[35]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[36]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[37]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[38]  G. Graen,et al.  Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization , 1982 .

[39]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. , 2006 .

[40]  Claus W. Langfred,et al.  Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.