Frequency-Diverse Computational Microwave Phaseless Imaging

Phaseless imaging approaches provide a significant advantage for systems where maintaining coherency during the acquisition time is difficult. Here, we demonstrate a phaseless, frequency-diverse, computational imaging system that operates at K-band frequencies (17.5–26.5 GHz). The system consists of a cavity-backed metasurface antenna producing spatially diverse radiation patterns that vary as a function of the driving frequency. The frequency-diverse metasurface antenna can be used to form images at microwave frequencies by collecting measurements at frequencies sampled over the operational bandwidth, obviating the need for either mechanically moving parts or phase-shifting circuits. We show that high-fidelity images can be obtained with the metasurface antenna using only the intensity of the measurements by leveraging a sparse variant of the Wirtinger Flow algorithm. In addition to the hardware simplification achieved by using a frequency-diverse approach, we demonstrate a significant reduction in the number of measurements required to reconstruct a given number of voxels for the phaseless imaging problem. This difference from conventional phase retrieval techniques is achieved by leveraging the sparsity concept, simplifying the complexity of the imaging problem.

[1]  David R. Smith,et al.  Resolution of the Frequency Diverse Metamaterial Aperture Imager , 2015 .

[2]  David R. Smith,et al.  Printed Aperiodic Cavity for Computational and Microwave Imaging , 2016, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[3]  David R. Smith,et al.  Computational imaging using a mode-mixing cavity at microwave frequencies , 2015 .

[4]  Jose A. Martinez-Lorenzo,et al.  Millimeter Wave Imaging Architecture for On-The-Move Whole Body Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Yazhou Wang,et al.  Advanced System Level Simulation Platform for Three-Dimensional UWB Through-Wall Imaging SAR Using Time-Domain Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  O. Yurduseven,et al.  Microwave imaging using indirect holographic techniques , 2014, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[7]  I. Stefanescu On the phase retrieval problem in two dimensions , 1985 .

[8]  David R. Smith,et al.  Spatially resolving antenna arrays using frequency diversity. , 2016, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Fernando Las-Heras,et al.  Phaseless Synthetic Aperture Radar With Efficient Sampling for Broadband Near-Field Imaging: Theory and Validation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[10]  Yuxin Chen,et al.  Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systems , 2015, NIPS.

[11]  Thomas Fromenteze,et al.  Phaseless computational imaging with a radiating metasurface. , 2016, Optics express.

[12]  Ziyang Yuan,et al.  Phase Retrieval via Sparse Wirtinger Flow , 2017, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[13]  N. Nikolova Microwave Imaging for Breast Cancer , 2011, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[14]  David R. Smith,et al.  Comprehensive simulation platform for a metamaterial imaging system. , 2015, Applied optics.

[15]  Arthur A. Oliner,et al.  Phased array antennas , 1972 .

[16]  David R. Smith,et al.  Fourier Accelerated Multistatic Imaging: A Fast Reconstruction Algorithm for Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output Radar Imaging , 2017, IEEE Access.