Experimental Investigation on the Plasticity of Hexagonal Aluminum Honeycomb Under Multiaxial Loading

A new custom-built universal biaxial testing device (UBTD) is introduced and successfully used to investigate the response of aluminum honeycomb under various combinations of large shear and compressive strains in its tubular direction. At the macroscopic level, different characteristic regimes are identified in the measured shear and normal stress-strain curves: elastic I, elastic II, nucleation, softening, and crushing. The first elastic regime shows a conventional linear elastic response, whereas the second elastic regime is nonlinear due to the generation of elastic buckles in the honeycomb microstructure. Nucleation is the point at which the cellular structure loses its load carrying capacity as a result of plastic collapse. It precedes a rapid drop of stress levels in the softening regime as pronounced plastic collapse bands emerge in the microstructure. Formation and growth of plastic folds dominate the microstructural response in the crushing phase. The mechanical features of this phase are long stress plateaus for both the corresponding shear and compressive stress-strain curses. Based on these observations, honeycomb plasticity is established by making analogies of plastic hinge lines and folding systems in the cellular microstructure with dislocations and slip line systems in a solid lattice, respectively. The initial yield surface is found to take the form of an ellipse in stress space, while the crushing behavior is described by a linear envelope along with a nonassociated flow rule based on total strain increments.

[1]  D. Mohr,et al.  Nucleation and propagation of plastic collapse bands in aluminum honeycomb , 2003 .

[2]  H. G. Allen Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels , 1969 .

[3]  D. Mohr,et al.  Microstructural response of aluminum honeycomb to combined out-of-plane loading , 2003 .

[4]  Tomasz Wierzbicki,et al.  Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs , 1983 .

[5]  Mc Farland,et al.  HEXAGONAL CELL STRUCTURES UNDER POST-BUCKLING AXIAL LOAD , 1963 .

[6]  Dirk Mohr,et al.  Deformation-induced folding systems in thin-walled monolithic hexagonal metallic honeycomb , 2004 .

[7]  Michael P. F. Sutcliffe,et al.  Indentation failure analysis of sandwich beams , 2000 .

[8]  D. Mohr,et al.  Analysis of the Arcan Apparatus in the Clamped Configuration , 2002 .

[9]  J. M. Alexander AN APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF THIN CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER AXIAL LOADING , 1960 .

[10]  S. Kelsey,et al.  The Shear Modulus of Foil Honeycomb Cores , 1958 .

[11]  H. G. Allen,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – SANDWICH BEAMS , 1969 .

[12]  Stelios Kyriakides,et al.  In-plane biaxial crushing of honeycombs—: Part II: Analysis , 1999 .

[13]  E. E. Sechler,et al.  The Strength of Thin Plates in Compression , 1932, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[14]  William James Stronge,et al.  Elasto-plastic yield limits and deformation laws for transversely crushed honeycombs , 1988 .

[15]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures , 1983 .

[16]  Crushing of soft-core sandwich profiles: experiments and analysis , 2003 .

[17]  Dirk Mohr,et al.  A new method for the biaxial testing of cellular solids , 2003 .

[18]  Z. Hashin,et al.  A method to produce uniform plane-stress states with applications to fiber-reinforced materials , 1978 .