Creativity evaluation in a cognitive architecture

Abstract Evaluation is a key factor of creativity: for this reason it should be integrated into a cognitive architecture of a creative artificial agent. The approach illustrated in this paper uses the Psi model, and describes the framework for introducing internal and external evaluations, and how they influence demands and motivation of the artificial agent. Internal evaluation mechanisms drive the creative process, and influence competence of the creative agent. External evaluation acts through certainty, and requires interaction with human users that express both opinions and some subjective quantitative evaluations on the final artwork. The system uses natural language processing techniques in order to infer the satisfaction and the emotional impact of the final product obtained by the creative agent.

[1]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  An Approach to Detect Polarity Variation Rules for Sentiment Analysis , 2014, WEBIST.

[2]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity Theory: The FACE and IDEA Descriptive Models , 2011, ICCC.

[3]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Combining Representational Domains for Computational Creativity , 2014, ICCC.

[4]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Computer Models of Creativity , 2009, AI Mag..

[5]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Binding representational spaces of colors and emotions for creativity , 2013, BICA 2013.

[6]  Ben Goertzel,et al.  A world survey of artificial brain projects, Part II: Biologically inspired cognitive architectures , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[7]  P. Machado,et al.  Computing Aesthetics with Image Judgement Systems , 2012 .

[8]  Gary Roberts,et al.  Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer , 2008 .

[9]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Motivational System for Regulating Human-Robot Interaction , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expressions , 2003, EMNLP.

[11]  Simon Colton,et al.  Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier? , 2012, ECAI.

[12]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  K. Heilman,et al.  Creative Innovation: Possible Brain Mechanisms , 2003, Neurocase.

[14]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Creativity and Artificial Intelligence , 1998, IJCAI.

[15]  Philip Galanter,et al.  Computational Aesthetic Evaluation: Past and Future , 2012 .

[16]  Ignazio Infantino,et al.  Implementation of an Intentional Vision System to Support Cognitive Architectures , 2016, VISAPP.

[17]  Anna Jordanous,et al.  A Standardised Procedure for Evaluating Creative Systems: Computational Creativity Evaluation Based on What it is to be Creative , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[18]  Bing Liu,et al.  Mining and summarizing customer reviews , 2004, KDD.

[19]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Robotic Creativity Driven by Motivation and Semantic Analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[20]  Ignazio Infantino,et al.  An Artificial Behavioral Immune System for cognitive robotics , 2013, ECAL.

[21]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Introducing a creative process on a cognitive architecture , 2013, BICA 2013.

[22]  Ben Goertzel,et al.  OpenPsi: Realizing Dörner's "Psi" Cognitive Model in the OpenCog Integrative AGI Architecture , 2011, AGI.

[23]  Alessandro Genco,et al.  A Multimodal Interaction Guide for Pervasive Services Access , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services.

[24]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  I Feel Blue: Robots and Humans Sharing Color Representation for Emotional Cognitive Interaction , 2012, BICA.

[25]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Humanoid Introspection: A Practical Approach , 2013 .

[26]  Yuefeng Li,et al.  Product Feature Taxonomy Learning based on User Reviews , 2014, WEBIST.

[27]  Giovanni Pilato,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction Based on Introspective Capability , 2012, 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems.