A phantom design and assessment of lesion detectability in PET imaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
Adam M. Alessio | Paul E. Kinahan | Scott David Wollenweber | Paul Kinahan | A. Alessio | S. Wollenweber
[1] P.H. Pretorius,et al. Single-slice versus multi-slice display for human-observer lesion-detection studies , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).
[2] Paul Kinahan,et al. A quantitative approach to a weight-based scanning protocol for PET oncology imaging , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.
[3] F. Vallentin,et al. Upper bounds for packings of spheres of several radii , 2012, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma.
[4] D. Mankoff,et al. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Whole-Body Oncologic Studies: A Human Observer Lesion Detection and Localization Study , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[5] Kyle J Myers,et al. Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] H H Barrett,et al. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[7] Suleman Surti,et al. Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-flight PET , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.
[8] Eric C. Frey,et al. Evaluation of myocardial defect detection between parallel-hole and fan-beam SPECT using the Hotelling trace , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.
[9] Paul E Kinahan,et al. A phantom design for assessment of detectability in PET imaging. , 2016, Medical physics.
[10] P.H. Pretorius,et al. A comparison of human and model observers in multislice LROC studies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[11] Matthew A Kupinski,et al. Assessing image quality and dose reduction of a new x-ray computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm using model observers. , 2014, Medical physics.
[12] D. Lalush,et al. Comparison of Hotelling observer models and human observers in defect detection from myocardial SPECT imaging , 1999 .
[13] Xiao Jin,et al. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.
[14] J. Karp,et al. Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] Adam Wunderlich,et al. Exact Confidence Intervals for Channelized Hotelling Observer Performance in Image Quality Studies , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[16] H H Barrett,et al. Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[17] H. Makse,et al. A phase diagram for jammed matter , 2008, Nature.
[18] F. Fazio,et al. Generation of the Acquisition-Specific NEC (AS-NEC) Curves to Optimize the Injected Dose in 3D$^18$F-FDG Whole Body PET Studies , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[19] B.M.W. Tsui,et al. Comparison of channelized hotelling and human observers in determining optimum OS-EM reconstruction parameters for myocardial SPECT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[20] E. Hoffman,et al. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .
[21] H.C. Gifford,et al. Evaluation of multiclass model observers in PET LROC studies , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..
[22] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers , 1997, Medical Imaging.