An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development

A new product development (NPD) process can be thought as a comprehensive process in which the design is progressively detailed through a series of phases. At the end of each phase a design review is held to approve the design and release or not it to the next level. As one of these phases, concept selection aiming to select the most appropriate concept for further development, is conducted earlier in the process. As the further development progresses on a selected concept, it becomes more difficult to make design changes in terms of cost and schedule dimensions, and therefore, selecting the best concept among a set of available alternatives has been an important issue for companies. On the other hand, in the presence of many alternatives and selection criteria, the selection problem becomes a multiple-criteria decision making concept selection problem. To solve this problem, in this work, an integrated approach bringing two popular methods together: the modified technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the analytical network process (ANP). The ANP method is used to determine the relative weights of a set of quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria, as the modified TOPSIS method utilized to rank competing concept alternatives. In addition, a real example is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed approach for potential practitioners and readers.

[1]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods , 2000 .

[2]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[3]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[4]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes , 1992 .

[5]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[6]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[7]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[8]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Concept selection methods - a literature review from 1980 to 2008 , 2008 .

[9]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Design strategy and its interface with manufacturing and marketing: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[10]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach , 2003 .

[11]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? , 2002 .

[13]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[14]  Ali Görener,et al.  Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company , 2012 .

[15]  I. S. Sariyildiz,et al.  The analytical hierarchy process applied for design analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[17]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[18]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[19]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[20]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment , 2005 .

[21]  Stuart A. Rosenfeld Manufacturing by Design , 2018, Economic Development Quarterly.

[22]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[23]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[24]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[25]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Z. Ayağ,et al.  An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment , 2007 .

[27]  Rifat Gürcan Özdemir,et al.  An intelligent approach to machine tool selection through fuzzy analytic network process , 2011, J. Intell. Manuf..

[28]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Design co-ordination for concurrent engineering , 1993 .

[29]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection , 2006, Math. Comput. Model..

[30]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[31]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Optimization of design utility , 1991 .

[32]  He-Yau Kang,et al.  A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[33]  Michael J. Scott,et al.  Quantifying Certainty in Design Decisions: Examining AHP , 2002 .

[34]  G.E. Okudan,et al.  A Multi-Stage Problem Formulation for Concept Selection for Improved Product Design , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[35]  Lionel C. Briand COTS evaluation and selection , 1998, Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272).

[36]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[37]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[38]  Huan-Jyh Shyur,et al.  COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[39]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[40]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[41]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Jiuh-Biing Sheu,et al.  A hybrid neuro-fuzzy analytical approach to mode choice of global logistics management , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An analytic-hierarchy-process based simulation model for implementation and analysis of computer-aided systems , 2002 .

[44]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[45]  Zahari Taha,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[46]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  An integrative supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS and multi criteria goal programming , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[47]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[48]  A. M. King,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies , 1999 .

[49]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment , 2005 .

[50]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making, Scaling, and Number Crunching , 1989 .

[51]  Semih Onüt,et al.  Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. , 2008, Waste management.

[52]  R. Shankar,et al.  On‐line trust building in e‐enabled supply chain , 2003 .