Hybrid Link/Path-Based Design for Translucent Photonic Network Dimensioning

The advancement of ultralong-haul transmission technology has dramatically enhanced the all-optical reaches. However, the actual situations of installed fiber and sites for terrestrial network often prevent implementing a purely transparent network, and thus, opaque reshaping retiming regenerating (3R) regeneration is required to guarantee optical signal reachability. Since 3R regenerators based on optical/electrical/optical conversion tend to dominate the total network costs, an efficient network design method that allocates a minimum number of 3R regenerators to optimum locations is essential to build a cost-effective photonic network. In this paper, we propose such a network-dimensioning method by combining the advantages of link-based and path-based design approaches. It first guarantees optical signal reachability for any possible traffic demand in each segmented linear link. After combining all the links, excessive regenerators are eliminated based on the optical signal quality check with -factor calculation for each wavelength path. A trial design of a large-scale mesh network demonstrated a significant cost savings of more than 30% in comparison with a conventional link-based design. In the trial, the impact of fiber loss coefficient over the total network cost was investigated quantitatively, addressing the importance of such quantitative modeling and analysis.

[1]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[2]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Routing and wavelength assignment in all-optical networks , 1995, TNET.

[3]  Angela Chiu,et al.  Issues for routing in the optical layer , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[4]  V.,et al.  Design of Ring and Mesh based WDM Transport Networks , 2000 .

[5]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[6]  Ori Gerstel,et al.  Optical layer survivability-an implementation perspective , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  R. Egorov,et al.  DWDM system architecture and design trade-offs , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[8]  M. Miyabe,et al.  Translucent photonic network dimensioning for equipment cost minimization , 2004, Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2004. OFC 2004.

[9]  S. Meyer Quantification of wavelength contention in photonic networks with reach variation , 2002, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit.

[10]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath communications: an approach to high bandwidth optical WAN's , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Integer and Combinatorial Optimization , 1988 .

[12]  J.P. Heritage,et al.  Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks , 1999, OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication.

[13]  Gaoxi Xiao,et al.  Algorithms for allocating wavelength converters in all-optical networks , 1999, TNET.

[14]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Wavelength conversion in optical networks , 1999, SODA '99.

[15]  Ding-Zhu Du,et al.  Optimal Placement of Wavelength Converters for Guaranteed Wavelength Assignment in WDM Networks , 2002 .

[16]  L. R. Ford,et al.  NETWORK FLOW THEORY , 1956 .

[17]  Ramesh Bhandari Optimal diverse routing in telecommunication fiber networks , 1994, Proceedings of INFOCOM '94 Conference on Computer Communications.