Physical Activity in Relation to Mammographic Density in the Dutch Prospect-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort

Background: Evidence accumulates that physical inactivity is one of the few modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. The mechanism through which physical inactivity affects breast cancer risk is not clear. The study aim was to investigate the association between physical activity and breast density because mammographic density is strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Methods: We did a cross-sectional study in 620 women, of ages 49 to 68 years and participants of the Dutch Prospect-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. A self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain information on duration and intensity of physical activity (recreational, household, and occupational) during the year preceding study recruitment. A total activity index (inactive, moderately inactive, moderately active, and active) was estimated by combining all activity types. Percent and absolute breast density were determined on screening mammograms using a computer-aided method. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine the association between physical activity and breast density. Results: Mean percent density was 35.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 31.8-38.8] for the inactive category compared with 36.1% (95% CI, 33.0-39.2) for the active category. Mean absolute density values for the inactive and active category were 45.8 cm2 (95% CI, 40.9-50.7) and 42.6 cm2 (95% CI, 38.3-47.0), respectively. Subgroup analysis for postmenopausal women showed similar results, as did separate analyses for recreational and household activity. Conclusions: The result does not support a relation between current physical activity and mammographic density in postmenopausal women. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(3):456–60)

[1]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Physical activity energy expenditure predicts changes in body composition in middle-aged healthy whites: effect modification by age. , 2005, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[2]  R. Warren Hormones and mammographic breast density. , 2004, Maturitas.

[3]  R. Shi,et al.  IGF‐I and breast cancer: A meta‐analysis , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[4]  C. Ulrich,et al.  Effect of exercise on serum estrogens in postmenopausal women: a 12-month randomized clinical trial. , 2004, Cancer research.

[5]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Physical inactivity and percent breast density among Hispanic women , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[6]  S. Cummings,et al.  Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Caroline Diorio,et al.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  C. Ulrich,et al.  Effect of Exercise on Total and Intraabdominal Body Fat in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2003 .

[9]  John D Potter,et al.  Effect of exercise on total and intra-abdominal body fat in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  F. Berrino,et al.  Fasting glucose is a risk factor for breast cancer: a prospective study. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[11]  C. Friedenreich,et al.  Physical activity and cancer prevention: from observational to intervention research. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  H. Adami,et al.  Overweight as an avoidable cause of cancer in Europe , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[13]  R. Finnell,et al.  Physical activity and cancer risk , 2001, The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[14]  R. Finnell,et al.  Genes, folate and homocysteine in embryonic development , 2001, The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[15]  T. Sellers,et al.  Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[16]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  L. Tabár,et al.  Moderate physical activity in relation to mammographic patterns. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[18]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  E. John,et al.  Recreational and occupational physical activities and risk of breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  L. Tabár,et al.  The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[21]  N F Boyd,et al.  Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  E. Riboli,et al.  Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  D. Albanes,et al.  Are cell number and cell proliferation risk factors for cancer? , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  R. Frisch,et al.  Delayed Menarche and Amenorrhea in Ballet Dancers , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  E. Riboli,et al.  Prospect-EPIC Utrecht: Study design and characteristics of the cohort population , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[29]  N Slimani,et al.  Estimation of reproducibility and relative validity of the questions included in the EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.