Neighbourhood Effects on Masked Form Priming in Developing Readers

The processing of a written word can be facilitated by the brief prior presentation of an orthographically similar stimulus. However, for adults, this masked form-priming effect does not occur if the target looks like many other words (i.e. if it has many neighbours). The usual interpretation of this result is that the adult word recognition system is tuned to the differing discrimination demands of words: If a word looks like many others, a more precise recognition procedure is required than if it is orthographically distinctive. This theory has developmental implications: Children should show more form priming for high neighbourhood words than adults and should show a gradual reduction in priming as their written vocabularies become larger. Masked form priming was examined in three groups of developing readers, from grades 2, 4 and 6, and a group of adults. In a lexical decision task, the children showed significantly greater priming overall than the adults for high N words. However, the predicted gradu...

[1]  K I Forster,et al.  The prime lexicality effect: form-priming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Chris Davis,et al.  The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: interference effects from a masked prime , 1991 .

[3]  C. Dollaghan,et al.  Children's phonological neighbourhoods: half empty or half full? , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  P. Luce,et al.  Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children's lexicons , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  Jackie Masterson,et al.  Are children's representations of words distributed? effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity of naming , 1994 .

[6]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[7]  Kathryn E. Perry,et al.  Automatic Lexical Access in Children: New Evidence from Masked Identity-Priming. , 1994 .

[8]  Philip H. K. Seymour,et al.  Beginning reading without phonology , 1986 .

[9]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[10]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Varieties of developmental dyslexia , 1993, Cognition.

[11]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990 .

[12]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .

[14]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked Repetition Priming of Words and Nonwords: Evidence for a Nonlexical Basis for Priming , 1997 .

[15]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Chapter 7 Orthographic Neighborhoods and Visual Word Recognition , 1992 .

[16]  M. Taft.  The body of the BOSS : subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words , 1992 .

[17]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked Orthographic Priming: The Effect of Prime-Target Legibility , 1994 .

[18]  C. Davis,et al.  Masked Homophone and Pseudohomophone Priming in Children and Adults , 1998 .

[19]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[20]  M Taft,et al.  Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[24]  A. Healy,et al.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[26]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.