Exploring a structured decision approach as a means of fostering participatory space policy making at NASA

Abstract In 1996, the National Research Council's Committee on Risk Characterization argued convincingly for the implementation of more participatory approaches to improve policy making by incorporating a wide range of stakeholder values and concerns in policy decisions. Guidance about how to best carry out such an approach in an agency like NASA is less clear. To address this gap, this paper discusses how the use of a structured approach to involve expert and non-expert stakeholders in policy making can improve the quality of stakeholder involvement and resulting decisions for space policy making at NASA. Supporting this discussion are results from two recent experiments. One compared the quality and type of participants’ input in a conventional stakeholder workshop with that of a more structured participatory process. The results from this experiment showed that a structured decision approach leads to more thoughtful and better-informed decisions. A second experiment showed that structured, participatory decision processes can help to legitimize space policy decisions after they have been implemented, leading to future benefits for the space agency.

[1]  John A. Alic,et al.  Technology and politics , 1989 .

[2]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Value-focused thinking for environmental risk consultations , 2001 .

[3]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using Stakeholder Values to Make Smarter Environmental Decisions , 2000 .

[4]  S. Kafandaris.  Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective , 1993 .

[5]  Michal Heiman,et al.  From ‘Not in My Backyard!’ to ‘Not in Anybody's Backyard!’ , 1990 .

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Understanding Life-Threatening Risks , 1995 .

[7]  C. Seligman,et al.  Factors Motivating Community Participation in Regional Water-Allocation Planning: A Test of an Expectancy-Value Model , 1991 .

[8]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Beyond Confused Noise: Ideas Toward Communicative Procedural Justice , 1998 .

[9]  R. Gregory,et al.  Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values , 1994 .

[10]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[11]  R. Gregory,et al.  Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions , 2001 .

[12]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Democratizing Risk Management: Successful Public Involvement in Local Water Management Decisions , 1999 .

[13]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  M. Kraft,et al.  Environmental Justice and the Allocation Of Risk: The Case of Lead and Public Health , 1995 .

[16]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[17]  E. Peelle.  Beyond the NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) impasse II: Public participation in an age of distrust , 1988 .

[18]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[19]  G. W. Cormick,et al.  Mediation and scientific issues , 1986 .

[20]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[21]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[22]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  Evaluating NASA's role in risk communication process surrounding space policy decisions , 2000 .

[23]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk-based decision making , 1998 .

[25]  Ortwin Renn.  A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management , 1999 .

[26]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[27]  R. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting public values for complex policy decisions , 1990 .

[28]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Behavioral Decision Research: An Overview , 1998 .

[29]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[30]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing Environmental Policy Options: A Case Study Comparison of Multiattribute and Contingent Valuation Survey Methods , 2000 .

[31]  R Gregory,et al.  Testing a Structured Decision Approach: Value‐Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .