The Glass is Half-Full: Overestimating the Quality of a Novel Environment is Advantageous

According to optimal foraging theory, foraging decisions are based on the forager's current estimate of the quality of its environment. However, in a novel environment, a forager does not possess information regarding the quality of the environment, and may make a decision based on a biased estimate. We show, using a simple simulation model, that when facing uncertainty in heterogeneous environments it is better to overestimate the quality of the environment (to be an “optimist”) than underestimate it, as optimistic animals learn the true value of the environment faster due to higher exploration rate. Moreover, we show that when the animal has the capacity to remember the location and quality of resource patches, having a positively biased estimate of the environment leads to higher fitness gains than having an unbiased estimate, due to the benefits of exploration. Our study demonstrates how a simple model of foraging with incomplete information, derived directly from optimal foraging theory, can produce well documented complex space-use patterns of exploring animals.

[1]  A. Houston,et al.  Environmental variability can select for optimism or pessimism. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[2]  Angus J. C. McMorland,et al.  Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  J. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[5]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C. S. Holling.  Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[7]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  R. Dukas.  Life history of learning: performance curves of honeybees in settings that minimize the role of learning , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  D. Crook.  Movements associated with home-range establishment by two species of lowland river fish , 2004 .

[11]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  Should Prey Overestimate the Risk of Predation? , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  Pierre Bernhard,et al.  Optimal patch time allocation for time-limited foragers , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence , 2009 .

[15]  David W. Stephens,et al.  On economically tracking a variable environment , 1987 .

[16]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Richard F. Green.  A simpler, more general method of finding the optimal foraging strategy for Bayesian birds , 2006 .

[18]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of overconfidence , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Michael L. Johnson.  Exploratory behavior and dispersal: a graphical model , 1989 .

[20]  Lee H. Metzgab.  AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF SCREECH OWL PREDATION ON RESIDENT AND TRANSIENT WHITE-FOOTED MICE (PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS) , 1967 .

[21]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Exploration or exploitation: life expectancy changes the value of learning in foraging strategies , 2007 .

[22]  María del Mar Delgado,et al.  Changes of movement patterns from early dispersal to settlement , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Richard W. Miller.  Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[24]  David Eilam,et al.  On the border: perimeter patrolling as a transitional exploratory phase in a diurnal rodent, the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[25]  A. Bouskila,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Predation Hazard Assessment: Predictions from a Dynamic Model , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[27]  James D. Thomson,et al.  Trapline foraging by bumble bees: II. Definition and detection from sequence data , 1997 .

[28]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging , 1980 .

[29]  M. Subrahmanyam.  Theory and Evidence , 2013 .

[30]  E. Zimmermann,et al.  The influence of familiarity, age, experience and female mate choice on pregnancies in captive grey mouse lemurs , 2003 .

[31]  R. R. Bush,et al.  A mathematical model for simple learning. , 1951, Psychological review.

[32]  Alexander Lange,et al.  Bayesian Approximations and Extensions: Optimal Decisions for Small Brains and Possibly Big Ones Too , 2022 .

[33]  H. Winkler,et al.  The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots , 2002 .

[34]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[35]  R. Dukas.  Life History of Learning: Performance Curves of Honeybees in the Wild , 2008 .

[36]  Jonathan Wright.  Foraging: Behavior and Ecology, David W. Stephens, Joel S. Brown, Ronald C. Ydenberg (Eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2007), Pp. xiii+608. Price £23.50 paperback , 2008 .

[37]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Quantifying the Adaptive Value of Learning in Foraging Behavior , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[38]  I. Hanski,et al.  Habitat exploration and use in dispersing juvenile flying squirrels. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[39]  A. Oaten,et al.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[40]  C. Burns.  Behavioral ecology of disturbed landscapes: the response of territorial animals to relocation , 2005 .

[41]  M. Egas,et al.  Adaptive learning of host preference in a herbivorous arthropod , 2001 .

[42]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation , 2004 .

[43]  J. Hodges,et al.  Habitat use and spatial organisation of relocated black rhinos in Namibia , 2010 .

[44]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  A Learning-Based Model of Territory Establishment , 1999, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[45]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance , 2006 .

[46]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Bayes' theorem and its applications in animal behaviour , 2006 .

[48]  A. Houston,et al.  Assessing predation risk: optimal behaviour and rules of thumb. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[49]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[50]  L. Dill,et al.  A DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGETIC EQUIVALENCE OF THE RISK OF PREDATION , 1989 .

[51]  C. Rutz,et al.  Age-dependent diet choice in an avian top predator , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  W. H. Burt.  Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[53]  J. Thomson,et al.  Efficient harvesting of renewing resources , 2005 .