Planning 5G Networks Under EMF Constraints: State of the Art and Vision

The deployment of 5G networks will necessarily involve the installation of new base station (BS) equipment to support the requirements of next-generation mobile services. In a scenario where there exist already many sources of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), including overlapping 2G/3G/4G technologies of competing network operators, there is a growing concern that the planning of a 5G network will be severely constrained by the limits on maximum EMF levels established in a wide set of regulations. The goal of this paper is to shed light on EMF-aware 5G network planning and, in particular, on the problem of site selection for 5G BS equipment that abides by downlink EMF limits. To this end, we present the current state of the art in EMF-aware mobile networking and overview the current exposure limits and how the EMF constraints may impact 5G planning. We then substantiate our analysis by reporting on two realistic case studies, which demonstrate the saturation of EMF levels already occurring under current 2G/3G/4G networks, as well as the negative impact of strict regulations on network planning and user quality of service. Finally, we discuss the expected impact of 5G technologies in terms of EMFs and draw the guidelines for an EMF-aware planning of 5G. Our analysis suggests that the EMF-aware 5G planning risks to be a real challenge for network operators, which stimulates further actions at governmental, societal, technological, and research levels.

[1]  Zaher Dawy,et al.  On Radio network planning for next generation 5G networks: A case study , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA'15).

[2]  Haim Mazar Madjar,et al.  Human radio frequency exposure limits: An update of reference levels in Europe, USA, Canada, China, Japan and Korea , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE.

[3]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Comparison of average global exposure of population induced by a macro 3G network in different geographical areas in France and Serbia , 2016, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  Zhinong Ying,et al.  Exposure to RF EMF From Array Antennas in 5G Mobile Communication Equipment , 2016, IEEE Access.

[5]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Mobile Phones, Brain Tumors, and the Interphone Study: Where Are We Now? , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Not All Apps Are Created Equal: Analysis of Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Nationwide Mobile Service Usage , 2017, CoNEXT.

[7]  Giuseppe Bianchi,et al.  Superfluidity: a flexible functional architecture for 5G networks , 2016, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[8]  Bo Xu,et al.  Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of Multiple Antennas for Cellular Equipment Based on Semidefinite Relaxation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Shuai Zhang,et al.  Channel Characteristics and User Body Effects in an Outdoor Urban Scenario at 15 and 28 GHz , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[10]  Kris Vanhecke,et al.  Exposure optimization in indoor wireless networks by heuristic network planning , 2013 .

[11]  A. Iodice,et al.  A tool for planning electromagnetic field levels in urban areas , 2004, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, 2004..

[12]  Aleksandar Neskovic,et al.  Long-term variability of electromagnetic field strength for GSM 900MHz downlink band in Belgrade urban area , 2014, 2014 22nd Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR).

[13]  Elif Degirmenci,et al.  Assessment of Compliance With RF EMF Exposure Limits: Approximate Methods for Radio Base Station Products Utilizing Array Antennas With Beam-Forming Capabilities , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[14]  Marloes Eeftens,et al.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[15]  D. Mandrioli,et al.  Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague‐Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission , 2018, Environmental research.

[16]  Luc Martens,et al.  Optimizing LTE wireless access networks towards power consumption and electromagnetic exposure of human beings , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[17]  Seong-Cheol Kim,et al.  Cell Coverage Analysis of 28 GHz Millimeter Wave in Urban Microcell Environment Using 3-D Ray Tracing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[18]  Aleksander Orłowski,et al.  Assessment of human exposure to cellular networks electromagnetic fields , 2018, 2018 Baltic URSI Symposium (URSI).

[19]  I. Gil,et al.  Measurement of the environmental broadband electromagnetic waves in a mid‐size European city , 2017, Environmental research.

[20]  A. Faraone,et al.  Exposure Compliance Methodologies for Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Enabled Networks and Terminals , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[21]  Luc Martens,et al.  The LEXNET Project: Wireless Networks and EMF: Paving the Way for Low-EMF Networks of the Future , 2014, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[22]  Davide Colombi,et al.  Time-Averaged Realistic Maximum Power Levels for the Assessment of Radio Frequency Exposure for 5G Radio Base Stations Using Massive MIMO , 2017, IEEE Access.

[23]  Carla-Fabiana Chiasserini,et al.  Cellular Network Traces Towards 5G: Usage, Analysis and Generation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[24]  Aleksandar Neskovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of electromagnetic radiation measurements in the vicinity of GSM/UMTS base station installed on buildings in Serbia. , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[25]  Luc Martens,et al.  Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits. , 2014, Environment international.

[26]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[27]  国際非電離放射線防護委員会 ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 2009, Health physics.

[28]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Safe for Generations to Come: Considerations of Safety for Millimeter Waves in Wireless Communications , 2015, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[29]  Paolo Baracca,et al.  A Statistical Approach for RF Exposure Compliance Boundary Assessment in Massive MIMO Systems , 2018, WSA.

[30]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[31]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[32]  Bo Xu,et al.  Power Density Measurements at 15 GHz for RF EMF Compliance Assessments of 5G User Equipment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.